Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2018 Year 2018 This

Addition being the difference in receipts as per the Profit and ...


Court Deletes Income Addition Due to Lack of Evidence Linking Assessee to Alleged Parties Under AS-26 Discrepancies.

April 19, 2018

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Addition being the difference in receipts as per the Profit and Loss Account and as per AS-26 - addition was made solely based on the AIR information without bringing any cogent evidence on record to suggest that the assessee received income from the said parties especially when the assessee is denying any transactions with those parties - addition directed to be deleted - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Addition u/s 68 OR 41(1) - unexplained cash credit - Cessation of liability - The appellant contested additions to their income, alleging bogus sundry creditors. Despite...

  2. The Tribunal held that based on the financial parameters and risk profile, the assessee qualifies as a developer rather than merely a contractor u/s 80IA of the Income...

  3. Addition made u/s 153A on account of undisclosed foreign bank account and interest income thereon - assessee confronted with client profiles from HSBC Bank showing...

  4. ITAT overturned multiple additions made by AO regarding property transactions and unexplained cash receipts. On capital gains computation under s.50C, ITAT directed...

  5. Addition made u/s 69C of the Income Tax Act for alleged cash payments based on a WhatsApp message and statement of a third party. The key points are: The WhatsApp...

  6. Key legal issues and the Tribunal's holdings: Agricultural land sold by assessee situated beyond municipal limits cannot be treated as capital asset u/s 2(14). Addition...

  7. The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

  8. Non-disclosure of income from maintenance charges was challenged. The assessee followed the mercantile system of accounting, and non-receipt of maintenance charges...

  9. CIT(A) determined profit at 5.47% on total purchases. Assessee produced sufficient evidence regarding purchases, movement of goods, GST payment on transportation,...

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

  11. Accrual of income - Addition made to the income of the assessee received by the assessee from “JDS” and its associates, treated as own income of the assessee - Despite...

  12. The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of condonation of delay in filing appeals, which exceeded 400 days, due to unexplained cash deposits and protective additions...

  13. The assessee filed a revised return of income to correct the addition based on professional receipts in the original return. The hospital made a total payment of Rs....

  14. Addition on account of cash deposit to the bank account of the assessee - assessee is consistently submitting that the assessee has two bank accounts in her name and the...

  15. Assessee voluntarily declared income under "income from other sources" in return. AO disallowed deduction claimed for coordination and settlement expenses due to lack of...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates