Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

Addition made u/s 69C of the Income Tax Act for alleged cash ...


Tax Addition Overturned Due to Lack of Evidence; ITAT Rules WhatsApp Message Insufficient for Section 69C Claim.

September 23, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Addition made u/s 69C of the Income Tax Act for alleged cash payments based on a WhatsApp message and statement of a third party. The key points are: The WhatsApp message stating "Received 80@Dubai" was not found on the assessee's mobile but on an independent third party's mobile with no connection to the assessee. The statement of the third party did not implicate the assessee or suggest any payment was made on behalf of the assessee. There was a mismatch in the time period between the WhatsApp message and the statement. The assessee categorically denied any knowledge or business relationship with the parties involved. No corroborative evidence or material was found during the search at the assessee's premises. The addition was made solely based on secondary evidence from a third party's mobile and statement, without any evidence from the assessee's possession. The revenue's case lacked proper inquiry and failed to establish the assessee's involvement in the alleged transaction. The ITAT held that the addition was unjustified and decided against the revenue.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Addition u/s 69A on the basis of whatsapp messages - The ITAT noted that the mere presence of WhatsApp messages on a mobile phone does not conclusively prove that the...

  2. Addition u/s 69A in respect of unexplained money - search and seizure u/s 132 - In the WhatsApp messages, it was never stated that the money belonged to the assessee but...

  3. ITAT overturned multiple additions made by AO regarding property transactions and unexplained cash receipts. On capital gains computation under s.50C, ITAT directed...

  4. The case involved a penalty u/s 114(iii) of Customs Act, 1962 for mis-declaration of export goods leading to undue duty drawback benefit. The issue was the admissibility...

  5. Initiation of CIRP - recognition of WhatsApp message - If the operational creditor had acknowledged all other whatsapp msg, and did not deny having received them, there...

  6. Addition u/s 68 OR 41(1) - unexplained cash credit - Cessation of liability - The appellant contested additions to their income, alleging bogus sundry creditors. Despite...

  7. Addition in assessment u/s 153C - Addition u/s 69 - addition on basis of loose papers on which name of the appellant was mentioned along with some other parties - The...

  8. Condonation of delay - Delay in filling of an appeal before ITAT - The ITAT observed taht the appeal was delayed by 17 days. The assessee claimed the delay was due to...

  9. The assessment reopening u/s 147 read with Section 148 was found to be unsustainable due to the lack of independent application of mind by the Commissioner of Income Tax...

  10. The provisions of the IBC 2016 would prevail over the Income Tax Act 1961. Income Tax authorities have limited jurisdiction to assess/determine the quantum of Income Tax...

  11. Transfer of property deemed as short-term capital gain due to holding period less than 36 months, disallowing deduction u/s 54F. Additions for difference in commission...

  12. Assessee's unaccounted sales were estimated based on notebooks, diaries, and WhatsApp conversations. Only real income can be taxed. While unaccounted sales existed,...

  13. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

  14. Addition made u/s 153A on account of undisclosed foreign bank account and interest income thereon - assessee confronted with client profiles from HSBC Bank showing...

  15. The ITAT held that disallowance of advertisement expenses lacked merit as the charges were reasonable. The 15% discount received by the agent did not impact the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates