ITAT overturned multiple additions made by AO regarding property ...

Additions for Property Deals and Cash Receipts Deleted; Section 50C Valuation Referred to DVO for Fresh Assessment

February 19, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

ITAT overturned multiple additions made by AO regarding property transactions and unexplained cash receipts. On capital gains computation under s.50C, ITAT directed matter to DVO for fair market value determination, as circle rate adoption was disputed. Addition for alleged cash receipt was deleted due to lack of evidence and timing of property registration falling in subsequent assessment year. Regarding construction costs, cash flow statement requires AO's factual examination. Additions based on loose slips were deleted as documents lacked dates and definitive connection to assessment year. For s.68 addition concerning loan transaction, matter restored to AO for de novo adjudication considering assessee's explanation about generator sale. ITAT emphasized need for proper verification and evidence before making additions.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT overturned multiple additions made by AO regarding property ...

Additions for Property Deals and Cash Receipts Deleted; Section 50C Valuation Referred to DVO for Fresh Assessment

February 19, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The assessee objected to the valuation report prepared by the district valuation officer and the stamp duty rate. The assessing officer referred the matter to the...

Valuation by DVO - addition based on estimated cost disregarding actual cost as per books - applicability of section 142A before amendment - non-rejection of books - AO...

u/s 56(2)(vii)(b), the addition was made based on the difference between the stated value and the District Valuation Officer's (DVO) valuation. It was held that an...

Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) - AO referred the valuation of property to Valuation Cell and DVO - difference between the DVO value and consideration paid for purchase of...

CIT(A) determined profit at 5.47% on total purchases. Assessee produced sufficient evidence regarding purchases, movement of goods, GST payment on transportation,...

Validity of Referring the matter to DVO - Additions based on valuation report - The High Court noted that the assessee had filed its return for the relevant assessment...

Unexplained investment u/s. 69 - DDIT (Inv.) could not have referred the question of cost of construction/valuation of the assessee’s building to the Valuation Officer...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the addition u/s 56(2)(vii) or 28(iv) was unjustified, as the purchase was made with consideration, cheques were given to sellers with...

The ITAT adjudicated on the following issues: 1. Cost of acquisition for computing long-term capital gains on sale of ancestral agricultural land: The assessee's...

Addition u/s 56(2)(vii) r.w.s. 69 - difference between the purchase price i.e. circle rate/stamp duty value and the value determined by the DVO - This section can be...

Capital gain computation - valuation of property - Valuation report of DVO, after all, cannot be treated as the last word on valuation, and there has to be a grievance...

Reference of the matter to the DVO for valuation - difference in value adopted for stamp violation and actual amount received for sale of the immovable property - there...

The assessee purchased agricultural land whose stamp duty valuation was lower than the actual purchase consideration. The authorities sought to invoke section 56(2)(x)...

The assessee disputed the stamp duty value of land purchased, leading to the matter being referred to the District Valuation Officer (DVO). The DVO's valuation, based on...

The Appellate Tribunal considered two main issues: 1. Addition u/s 37(1) - Assessee incurred business loss due to default in property payment, allowed as revenue loss. 2....

Quick Updates: