Whether the omission of Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, ...

Section 3A of Central Excise Act Omitted; Prior Decisions Remain Valid Despite Change, Favors Department's Position.

May 2, 2018

Case Laws Central Excise HC

Whether the omission of Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 by Section 121 of Finance Act, 2001, without any saving clause would affect the proceedings in respect of which decision has already been taken prior to the date of omission? - the issues are answered in favour of the department - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Whether the omission of Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, ...

Section 3A of Central Excise Act Omitted; Prior Decisions Remain Valid Despite Change, Favors Department's Position.

May 2, 2018

Case Laws Central Excise HC

You may also like:

Levy of duty based on production capacity u/s 3A - specified textile products - Though Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was reintroduced by Section 79 of the...

HC ruled in favor of petitioner's right to file under Section 84 of TNVAT Act, 2006 regarding input tax credit denial. Court determined that the Section 84 application...

Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

Initiation of CIRP - There being categorical default by the Respondent prior to Section 10A period, the Corporate Debtor was clearly not entitled to claim the benefit of...

NCLAT dismissed appeal concerning operational creditor's Section 9 application under IBC. Court held that while Section 8 notice is mandatory prerequisite for filing...

Interpretation and applicability of Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding the recovery of erroneously refunded excise duty. It discusses whether the...

The High Court disposed of the writ petition, modifying the requirement to deposit only 10% of the remaining disputed tax amount for the impugned order to remain stayed....

Prior period expenditure - when prior period income is taxed prior period expenditure cannot be disallowed - AT

The Transfer Pricing Officer's order was held invalid as it was issued beyond the time limit prescribed u/s 92CA(3A) of the Act read with Section 153. The ITAT ruled...

Constitutional validity of Section 13(8)(b) read with Section 8(2) of the IGST Act - Supply of intermediary services as intermediary to his overseas customers - Neither...

The High Court allowed the appeals and set aside the impugned judgment of the Single Judge. The court held that to avail the Budgetary Support Scheme (BSS), the...

Disallowance of prior period expenditure - Mercantile system - Matching principles of accounting - The assessee had claimed deduction for such expenses, citing a...

Validity of policy decision - Imposing prohibition on export of Shark fins of all species of Shark - The rationality of the decision cannot be adjudged on a proof of...

The court held that the revenue authorities cannot question the decision of the Development Commissioner regarding bunching of products for domestic tariff area (DTA)...

Proceedings valid despite non-communication of case transfer as section 127 not applicable. Notice u/s 143(2) not time-barred. CIT(A) not required to decide validity of...

Quick Updates: