ST - Whether the revisional authority has jurisdiction to impose ...

Case Laws Service Tax

June 5, 2012

ST - Whether the revisional authority has jurisdiction to impose penalty for the first time when it has not been imposed by the adjudicating or assessing authority by invoking Section 80 – Held No - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

ST - Whether the revisional authority has jurisdiction to impose ...

Case Laws Service Tax

June 5, 2012

You may also like:

Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

Imposition of penalty under Section 78 - Merely because penalty under Section 78 has been imposed for the earlier period, no penalty can be imposed for any subsequent...

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Revision u/s 264 - penalty u/s 270A imposed - waiver of penalty u/s 270AA - The very fact that the indications were made that the matter fall within (a) and (c),...

Levy of penalty u/s 112 and 117 of CA on CHA and G card holder - mis-classification and mis-declaration of goods - The negligence of both the appellants herein is...

Penalty - When the assessing authority, in its discretion has held that no penalty is leviable, by virtue of Section 80 of the Act, the revisionary authority cannot...

CESTAT Chennai held that penalty u/s 114 Customs Act was not imposed on Respondents for smuggling undeclared cigarettes concealed with gypsum plaster. Penalty was...

Sec 112 (a) of the Customs Act 1962 has been mentioned for imposing penalty in the SCN but Adjudicating authority has imposed penalty under Sec 114 without giving any...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Levy of penalty - Generalia specialibus non derogant - levy of special penalty over general penalty - the Commissioner perfectly justified in imposing penalty under...

Penalty u/r 25 or 26 of CER - Mentioning wrong rule number - The first appellate authority was not correct in holding that mentioning Rule 25 was a typographical error...

Suo moto revision - Eligibility for deduction of the entire sub-contractors' payments made - Both the circumstances must co-exist before the revisional authority can...

The key points are regarding the penalty imposed u/s 271D read with Section 269SS, and the issue of whether the penalty orders were time-barred. The Assessing Officer...

Liability of duty – non–performance of export obligation – duty and interest is paid before the service of notice - order of the adjudicating authority imposing penalty...

Jurisdiction of Revisional Authority to revise an order - The decision of the Tribunal may not be acceptable to the Revisional Authority, but that cannot furnish any...

Quick Updates: