The prohibition in Second Proviso to Section 158BC(a) of the Act ...

Section 158BC(a) Proviso: No Revised Income Return Before Assessing Officer, But Additional Claims Allowed on Appeal.

August 13, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax HC

The prohibition in Second Proviso to Section 158BC(a) of the Act of filing a revised return of income before the Assessing Officer would not prohibit a Assessee from raising the additional claim before Appellate Authorities.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The prohibition in Second Proviso to Section 158BC(a) of the Act ...

Section 158BC(a) Proviso: No Revised Income Return Before Assessing Officer, But Additional Claims Allowed on Appeal.

August 13, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The issue pertained to the validity of filing a revised return after the prescribed time limit. The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order, stating that after the...

Income from pension fund u/s 10(23AAB) - CIT(A) admitted the fresh claim - Claim of exemption when the income is taxable u/s 44 - If the assessee failed to revise its...

Claim of expenditure in the revised return - Once, the assessee has realized that the claim was wrongly not made, the assessee has every right to revise the return...

Levy of interest under section 234C - It is pertinent to note that provisions of section 234C of the Act refers to the term “returned income” in comparison to the...

Rental income determination - assessee jointly owns 50% house property in Singapore with wife - offered 100% rental income for AY 2014-15 erroneously, rectified in...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the revised return of income filed by the assessee cannot be treated as invalid by the Assessing Officer (AO). Since the AO...

Validity of revised return 139(5) - Revised return did not conform to the prescription of section 139(5), before its substitution w.e.f. A.Y. 2017-18, which provided for...

Exemption u/s 11 - Admittedly, the claim of exemption was made in the revised return filed within the statutory time limit but was treated as defective only on flimsy...

Allowability of deduction u/s 80P - denial of claim by CIT-A solely on the ground that the assessee had not made a claim in the original or in the revised return of...

When the AO rejects the revised return then the whole return is invalid. In case AO makes addition from the revised return then it means that he recognizes the revised...

Validity of revised return filed vis-a-vis claims made thereunder - revised return treated as non-est - the appellant filed his original return otherwise than u/s 139(1)...

The assessee filed an original return u/s 139(4) and later discovered an omission, wrongly claiming deduction u/s 57 for interest paid on borrowed capital under 'Income...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) for concealment of income was challenged. The Assessing Officer (AO) alleged that the assessee understated turnover and concealed income...

Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - Disallowing Derivatives F & O loss and Speculation profit - The appellant sought to claim a deduction by way of a letter before the...

Quick Updates: