Stay on demand - Since the Order of the Tribunal is not complied ...

Tribunal Vacates Stay Order: Assessee's Repeated Adjournment Requests Delay Appeals, No Stay Justified.

September 8, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Stay on demand - Since the Order of the Tribunal is not complied with and the disposal of appeals are delayed on the default of the assessee because assessee has been seeking adjournment continuously, therefore, in our view, it is not a fit case for grant of stay - stay order vacated.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Stay on demand - Since the Order of the Tribunal is not complied ...

Tribunal Vacates Stay Order: Assessee's Repeated Adjournment Requests Delay Appeals, No Stay Justified.

September 8, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Denial of adjournment request - Release of goods based on forged documents leading to fraud - Customs clearance of imported mobile phones with duplicate IMEI numbers -...

Maintainability of appeal - non-prosecution of the case - Request for adjournment, which cannot be accepted in virtual hearing - The case involved repeated requests for...

Adjournment request - tribunal refused to adjourn the hearing and dismissed the appeal - when such requests were received by the Tribunal, seeking an adjournment of the...

ITAT dismissed taxpayer's appeal due to procedural deficiencies. Appeal involved 125-day delay without any condonation application being filed. Taxpayer failed to appear...

Delay in filling appeal before ITAT - Delay of 68 days involved in filing of the appeal - The Tribunal noted the substantial delay in filing the appeal and the absence...

Automatic vacation of a stay as granted on the completion of 365 days - Constitutional validity of the third proviso to Section 254(2A) - It is liable to be struck down...

Restoration of appeal - request for adjournment by fax and speed post - Registry failed to place the same on the date of hearing in the appeal folders - appeal restored - AT

The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case regarding rectification u/s 254 related to Compensation under BTALA. The Tribunal found the applicant's attempt for...

The CESTAT New Delhi, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a request for restoration of an appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. The appellant had submitted an...

Restoration of appeal - CESTAT dismissed the appeal for non compliance of stay order - the delay of 5 days in depositing the amount is condoned - appeal restored before...

Condonation of delay - delay of 280 days - sufficient cause - The Tribunal noted that the delay was due to the callous and lackadaisical approach of the appellant in not...

condonation of delay in filing appeal before the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) - time limit prescribed u/s 149 - The appellant's appeal challenging the rejection of...

Condonation of delay in filling appeal before ITAT - delay of 384 days - The assessee's delay in filing appeals, ranging from 383 to 384 days, was not condoned due to...

The ITAT held that a stay of demand can only be granted u/s 254(2A) subject to deposit of 20% of disputed demand or furnishing security. The Tribunal cannot violate...

Tribunal had passed the exparte order directing pre-deposit - repeated adjournment sought by the counsel - matter restored before tribunal for reconsideration - HC

Quick Updates: