Maintainability of appeal - non-prosecution of the case - ...

Appeal Dismissed for Non-Prosecution After Excessive Adjournments in Virtual Hearing, Urging Timely Justice.

March 14, 2024

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Maintainability of appeal - non-prosecution of the case - Request for adjournment, which cannot be accepted in virtual hearing - The case involved repeated requests for adjournment by the appellant's counsel during the hearing of an appeal. Despite statutory limitations and the Supreme Court's condemnation of the misuse of adjournments, the appellant's counsel persisted in seeking adjournments. As a result, the CESTAT dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution, emphasizing the importance of timely justice delivery and discouraging the practice of seeking repeated adjournments.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Maintainability of appeal - non-prosecution of the case - ...

Appeal Dismissed for Non-Prosecution After Excessive Adjournments in Virtual Hearing, Urging Timely Justice.

March 14, 2024

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

The CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, dismissed an appeal due to abatement caused by non-prosecution of the case. The Tribunal held that adjourning a matter beyond three...

Dismissal of the appeal by CIT(Appeals) for non-prosecution - The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision due to the assessee's failure to respond to multiple hearing notices...

ITAT dismissed taxpayer's appeal due to procedural deficiencies. Appeal involved 125-day delay without any condonation application being filed. Taxpayer failed to appear...

CESTAT ALLAHABAD dismissed an appeal due to abatement for adjourning the matter beyond three times, citing Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982. Referring to...

CESTAT rejected appeals for default under Rule 20 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982, due to appellant's non-appearance at hearings without valid justification. Following...

Dismissal of appeal for non-prosecution by CIT(A) - documents were e-filed - dismissed on the grounds that the impugned assessment order, demand notice and challan of...

CIT(Appeals) dismissed assessee's appeal for non-prosecution despite assessee being afforded multiple opportunities to participate. However, CIT(Appeals) failed to...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] under the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) and...

Maintainability of appeal - non-prosecution of the case - Matter has been listed quite a number of times in the past and appellant has been abstaining from attending the...

Dismissal of appeal for non-prosecution by ITAT - Tribunal could not have dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution but ought to have disposed of the appeal on merits...

ITAT dismissed an appeal solely on account of non-appearance of the appellant - the first application aforesaid of the petitioner, filed in or about March, 2017, for...

Competency of ITAT to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution – Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is not competent to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution - HC

CESTAT dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution pursuant to Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982. The appellant had sought adjournments beyond the statutory maximum...

Power of Tribunal u/s 254 to dismiss the appeal in limine - non prosecution - the Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeal only on the ground of non prosecution without...

The CESTAT dismissed an appeal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, after multiple adjournments exceeded the statutory maximum of three....

Quick Updates: