SEZ Unit - smuggling Gold - appellant knowingly removed the gold ...

Appellant's Gold Smuggling from SEZ Rejected; Commercial Reasons Insufficient for Relief, Risks Undermining SEZ Framework.

October 17, 2018

Case Laws Customs AT

SEZ Unit - smuggling Gold - appellant knowingly removed the gold bars of SEZ without proper procedure. - The appellant could not get any relief only by mentioning the commercial reason, if the excuses given by the appellant is accepted it would lead the situation whereby giving any excuse whole scheme of SEZ can be planted.

View Source

← Previous Next →

SEZ Unit - smuggling Gold - appellant knowingly removed the gold ...

Appellant's Gold Smuggling from SEZ Rejected; Commercial Reasons Insufficient for Relief, Risks Undermining SEZ Framework.

October 17, 2018

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

The appellant's gold was seized at the airport based on suspicions of smuggling. However, procedural irregularities, doubts about the voluntariness of the appellant's...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act 1962 - smuggling of Gold activity - reliability of statements - The appellant cannot come within the ambit of Section...

Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

Smuggling of gold - Imposition of penalties u/s 112 - The appellants were intercepted along with their luggage, which was found to contain smuggled gold bars. However,...

CESTAT ruled in favor of appellants in a gold jewelry smuggling case, overturning earlier decisions by Adjudicating Authority and Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal...

Customs Officers seized gold bars believing they were liable for confiscation under reasonable belief of smuggling. However, the gold was covered under proper documents,...

Confiscating absolutely seven gold bars having foreign make marking - Smuggling - Hyundai Verna Car - sufficient evidence to prove foreign origin goods - The Tribunal...

Smuggling of the gold bars - bona fide baggage - The Tribunal found that the appellant knowingly avoided declaring the gold bars upon arrival, thus violating customs...

Smuggling of gold - Baggage Rules - Prohibited goods or not - allegations are that appellants did not opt for red channel to declare the gold nor did they file any...

Smuggling - Absolute confiscation of three gold bars and one small piece of remelted gold - Penalty u/s 112(a) and (b)(i) of Customs Act - The Tribunal noted that the...

CESTAT set aside penalties imposed under s.112(a) and s.112(b) of Customs Act 1962 against appellant for alleged gold smuggling. Court found insufficient evidence beyond...

Smuggling - Gold - It is true that the conduct of the appellants was suspicious - But, the Officers did not have a reasonable belief in the first place to assert that...

Smuggling - gold bullion of foreign origin - notified goods or not - burden to prove - The appellants have sufficiently discharged their burden of proof in terms of...

Smuggling - recovery of Gold - foreign origin - The gold of Indian origin is generally of 916 purity (22 carat) - None of the appellants have placed on record any...

Smuggling - Confiscation of Gold - The gold being carried in the present facts and circumstances is neither of commercial quantity nor it was carrying the gold as the...

Quick Updates: