Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
VAT - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2018 Year 2018 This

Levy of penalty - as the mistake had crept in by the act of the ...


Penalty Rejected: Error Originated from Respondent Revenue's Actions, No Penalty Pursuable Against Involved Party.

October 26, 2018

Case Laws     VAT and Sales Tax     HC

Levy of penalty - as the mistake had crept in by the act of the respondent revenue themselves and therefore the respondent cannot seek any penalty

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Difference between assessed income and returned income arose due to inadvertent error in taking opening written down value (WDV) at book value instead of WDV under...

  2. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Period of limitation - The audit party is entitled to point out a factual error or omission in the assessment. reopening of the...

  3. Levy of Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 - Errors in e-way bills - The Court emphasized that minor typographical errors in e-way bills,...

  4. SC ruled on a contract dispute involving a bidding error where appellant mistakenly bid Rs.1,569 instead of Rs.15,04,64,000. While acknowledging appellant's error in...

  5. This instruction clarifies certain aspects of origin procedures under free trade agreements (FTAs), particularly regarding third-party invoicing. It emphasizes that the...

  6. Addition made u/s 69C of the Income Tax Act for alleged cash payments based on a WhatsApp message and statement of a third party. The key points are: The WhatsApp...

  7. Error apparent on record rectified by allowing Revenue's appeal instead of wrongly dismissing it, as logical conclusion of upholding Revenue's contentions. Rectification...

  8. Rectification of errors in filing GST Returns - The case involved errors made by the petitioner in their GST returns for the period July 2017, initially by incorrectly...

  9. The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee on the following issues: 1. Addition u/s 68 for refund of advances received from different parties was deleted. The ITAT held...

  10. The ITAT Mumbai considered a case involving a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal found the...

  11. This case pertains to a transfer pricing (TP) adjustment dispute involving the selection of the most appropriate method - Resale Price Method (RPM) or Transactional Net...

  12. Penalty proceedings u/s 270A - Applicable rate of penalty - The Appellate Tribunal noted that while the penalty notice cited under-reporting of income, the AO imposed...

  13. The key points are regarding the penalty imposed u/s 271D read with Section 269SS, and the issue of whether the penalty orders were time-barred. The Assessing Officer...

  14. Levy of service tax on cheque dishonour charges and late delivery charges was challenged. It was held that the recovery of liquidated damages or penalty from another...

  15. The case involved a challenge to penalty orders u/ss 271D and 271E before the Appellate Tribunal. The issue revolved around the reassessment proceedings being quashed,...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates