Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2018 Year 2018 This

Claim of deduction u/s. 37 in respect of amounts paid to GVF - ...


Deduction Denied: Payments to GVF Lacked Evidence of Marketable Trademark Value, Disallowing Expenses u/s 37.

December 1, 2018

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

Claim of deduction u/s. 37 in respect of amounts paid to GVF - there is nothing on record to suggest that trademark in question, had any marketable value and that the Assessee used said trademark for purpose of its products - Expenses not allowed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Undervaluation of imported goods - Patchouli Oil - The CESTAT found that the rejection of the declared value lacked legal basis and was unsupported by evidence. The...

  2. Rejection of transaction value declared by appellant was improper as it lacked cogent and comparable evidence from contemporaneous imports. Adjudicating authority failed...

  3. Refund - Lack of documentary evidence - appellants have not submitted the evidence of payment of service tax on the specified services for which the refunds were sought...

  4. The assessee denied the entries representing unaccounted cash expenditure, stating they were merely MIS reports for discussion purposes, containing approximate project...

  5. Computation of capital gains enshrined in section 48 - Deduction of Brokerage expense, Transfer expenses and indexed cost of improvement - Tribunal found the assessee...

  6. The case pertains to the valuation of imported goods and the inclusion of royalty payments for determining the transaction value. The key points are: The transaction...

  7. Customs authority rejected transaction value declared by importer and enhanced value based on email evidence and statement of partner admitting negotiated higher price....

  8. The assessee claimed exemption/deduction u/s 54F on account of investing long-term capital gains in a new residential house. The PCIT disallowed the claim, considering...

  9. The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving contravention of section 9(1)(f)(i) of FERA 1973. The appellant argued lack of material and violation of natural...

  10. Adjudication of a customs duty dispute involving the import of cars and the determination of the 'transaction value' u/s 14 of the Customs Act, 1962. The key points are:...

  11. Misdeclaration in the quantity of goods imported - enhancement of the value - Transaction value - demand of duty - The tribunal noted the discrepancy in quantity but...

  12. Valuation of imported goods - The transaction value which have been declared on the bill of entry is the invoice value for which letter of credit through a recognized...

  13. Payment for use of technical know-how and trademark/logo - it is patent that the payment has been made by the assessee for ‘use of ’ trademarks and not for acquiring...

  14. Transaction value must be accepted as assessable value unless proven incorrect through independent evidence, mere reference to NIDB data insufficient. Onus on Department...

  15. Valuation of imported goods - electronic goods including branded and non - The tribunal held that the adjudicating authority and the Commissioner (Appeals) failed to...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates