Penalty levied u/s 271(c) for failure to deduct TDS - Imposition ...

Penalty Imposed u/s 271(c) for TDS Non-Compliance is Civil, No Need to Prove Taxpayer's Bad Motive.

December 4, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Penalty levied u/s 271(c) for failure to deduct TDS - Imposition of penalty for non-compliance of statutory provision, is not a criminal liability, but is only a civil liability and therefore, bad motive on the part of the assessee is not essential to be proved.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty levied u/s 271(c) for failure to deduct TDS - Imposition ...

Penalty Imposed u/s 271(c) for TDS Non-Compliance is Civil, No Need to Prove Taxpayer's Bad Motive.

December 4, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

Validity of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance - The assessee has shown sufficient cause for non-compliance, moreover, such non-compliance was done by...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Default by assessee - mens rea is not an essential element for imposing penalty for non compliance of notices issued by AO - penalty confirmed - AT

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleted the penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) during reassessment proceedings....

To impose penalty u/s 271(1)(c), willful concealment is not an essential ingredient - HC

Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non comply with the notice issued u/s 142(1)- Once on record it is proved that notice was complied with, no penalty 271(1)(b) for non...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) - The Tribunal noted that in a previous round of proceedings, a penalty under section 271(1)(b) of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - default of non-compliance of the statutory notice issued under section 142(1) r.w.s. 129 - where the assessment order was finally passed u/s...

Penalty u/s. 271(l)(c) - The words may direct that such person shall pay by way of penalty in section 271 leave a certain amount of discretion in imposition of penalty...

The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

Quick Updates: