Reopening of assessment - Explanation 1 would not apply as all ...

Reassessment Blocked: All Facts Disclosed, AO's Reopening Deemed "Change of Opinion", Explanation 1 Not Applicable.

January 22, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Reopening of assessment - Explanation 1 would not apply as all primary facts were disclosed, stated and were known and in knowledge of the Assessing Officer. Further, this would be a case of ‘ change of opinion’ as the assessee had disclosed and had brought on record all facts.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Reopening of assessment - Explanation 1 would not apply as all ...

Reassessment Blocked: All Facts Disclosed, AO's Reopening Deemed "Change of Opinion", Explanation 1 Not Applicable.

January 22, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The ITAT Nagpur considered the validity of reassessment proceedings u/s 147. The AO issued notice beyond four years alleging capital gain on "Sale of Vehicles" escaped...

Validity of Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - When the primary facts necessary for assessment are fully and truly disclosed, the AO is not entitled on change of opinion...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - net loss of cancellation of forward contract - When the primary facts necessary for assessment are fully and truly disclosed, the AO is...

The High Court held that the Assessing Officer cannot reopen the assessment u/s 147 merely based on a change of opinion. The assessee had fully and truly disclosed all...

HC dismissed Revenue's appeal challenging reopening of assessment u/s 147. The court found no valid grounds for reassessment as there was no failure by assessee to...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as Assessing Officer (AO) failed to record that assessee did not disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - change of opinion - when the primary facts necessary for assessment are fully and truly disclosed, the Assessing Officer is not...

Reopening of Assessment u/s 147 - investment in NCDs unexplained - difference between accrual of income and receipt of income - reopening after the expiry of four years...

HC invalidated reassessment proceedings initiated under s.147 for AY 2014-15. AO's reliance solely on insight portal information regarding transactions with ASE Capital...

The case involves the validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147/148 based on reasons to believe, where the head of income was changed from business to income from...

The High Court held that the Assessing Officer (AO) could not reopen the assessment merely based on a belief that the average gross profit in the assessee's business...

Reopening of assessment - reason to believe - onus to prove - The High court noted that reassessment beyond four years from the end of the relevant assessment year is...

AO reopened assessment beyond 4 year period without establishing assessee failed to truly disclose material facts. ITAT quashed reopening, holding AO merely changed...

The case pertains to the validity of reopening of assessment by the Assessing Officer (AO) and the characterization of short-term capital gains (STCG) from the sale of...

Initiation of reassessment proceedings - AO has nowhere brought out as to how the claim of depreciation at higher level in the original assessment proceedings can be...

Quick Updates: