Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - depreciation at higher rates on ...

No Penalty for Higher Depreciation Claim on Office Flats, Bona Fide Explanation Accepted u/s 271(1)(c.

February 12, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - depreciation at higher rates on valuation of the office flats - the assessee has come out with bonafide explanation and under these circumstances no penalty is exigible

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - depreciation at higher rates on ...

No Penalty for Higher Depreciation Claim on Office Flats, Bona Fide Explanation Accepted u/s 271(1)(c.

February 12, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The explanation given by the assessee for the depreciation claim, is neither bona-fide, nor substantiated - penalty confirmed - HC

No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed on the assessee for disallowance of depreciation. The ITAT held that the assessee did not deliberately claim depreciation with an...

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed for excess deduction claimed u/s 10B. The assessee furnished all relevant facts for computing total income, and provided detailed...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Revenue may or may not agree with this understanding of law of the assessee but the fact that there can be a bona fide view to that effect...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - failure on the part of legal heir of the deceased assessee to explain the source of part of the deposits - The mere failure on the part of the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – In the garb of the bona fide claim an assessee cannot escape levy of penalty - Onus was not on the AO to prove the negative - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - bona fide or mala fide with an intention to evade taxes - not exigible to levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act where the...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving the disallowance of electricity expenses leading to a penalty u/s 271(1)(c). The Tribunal noted the essential role of...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - claimed higher deduction u/s.36(1)(viia) based on opinion of the Central Statutory Auditors - latter on based on different view canvassed against...

Quick Updates: