Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2014 Year 2014 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – In the garb of the bona fide claim an ...


Taxpayers Can't Avoid Penalties u/s 271(1)(c) by Claiming Bona Fide Belief; Must Substantiate Claims Themselves.

July 16, 2014

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – In the garb of the bona fide claim an assessee cannot escape levy of penalty - Onus was not on the AO to prove the negative - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

  2. Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The explanation given by the assessee for the depreciation claim, is neither bona-fide, nor substantiated - penalty confirmed - HC

  3. No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed on the assessee for disallowance of depreciation. The ITAT held that the assessee did not deliberately claim depreciation with an...

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed for excess deduction claimed u/s 10B. The assessee furnished all relevant facts for computing total income, and provided detailed...

  6. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

  7. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - deduction of LTCG u/s 54F - The assessee acted in bona fide belief and made the claim is not acceptable due to any reason and was...

  8. Penalty under section 271(1)(c) – assessee in bona fide belief that Dharmada collections were not part of its income but were diverted by an overriding title towards...

  9. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The Revenue argued that the assessee's actions constituted furnishing inaccurate particulars of income or concealing income. However, the High...

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

  11. Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - bona fide or mala fide with an intention to evade taxes - not exigible to levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act where the...

  12. Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

  13. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) claimed in the original return and later in the return filed in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act,...

  14. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bonafide belief - restriction of claim of deduction u/s 80IC to 25% from 100% claimed on account of substantial expansion - differing orders...

  15. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Revenue may or may not agree with this understanding of law of the assessee but the fact that there can be a bona fide view to that effect...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates