Order u/s 254 (1) passed beyond the period of 90 days from the ...

Order u/s 254(1) Recalled for Exceeding 90-Day Limit After Hearing Conclusion by One Day.

February 18, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Order u/s 254 (1) passed beyond the period of 90 days from the date of conclusions of its hearing - Since, in the present case, the order has been pronounced one day beyond 90 days prescribed under the Rules, we recall the order

View Source

← Previous Next →

Order u/s 254 (1) passed beyond the period of 90 days from the ...

Order u/s 254(1) Recalled for Exceeding 90-Day Limit After Hearing Conclusion by One Day.

February 18, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Pronouncement of orders not within 90 days - Covid-19 epidemic - Even without the words “ordinarily”, in the light of the above analysis of the legal position, the...

Tribunal held that an order passed following binding precedents cannot be recalled or reviewed based on a subsequent contrary judgment of a higher court. Once an order...

Pronouncement of orders within 90 days after the conclusion of hearing - Covid-19 epidemic - Worldwide lockdown - We are of the considered view that rather than taking a...

Income Tax: Limit of remuneration to working partners in partnership firms allowed as deduction increased - on first Rs 6,00,000 of book profit or loss, Rs 3,00,000 or...

Maintainability of appeal before HC - ITAT dismissed the appeal of the Revenue on the ground that tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit, i.e. tax effect of Rs....

Power of tribunal recalling an earlier order in exercise of powers for rectification u/s 254 - ITAT, by majority order, recalled the order - No reason was shown by the...

Customs broker's license revoked by Commissioner for breach of regulations. CESTAT allowed appeal, holding that failure to issue show cause notice within 90 days of...

Cancellation of the IEC - EPCG Scheme - levy of penalty - the learned Judge while disposing the writ petition filed by the appellant, challenging the order of...

Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - Tribunal was not justified in recalling the order passed by it in toto and setting the matter down for a fresh hearing - HC

ITAT recalled its earlier order due to discovery of inadvertent errors, specifically the reliance on non-existing case laws identified during suo-moto review. Exercising...

The HC dismissed a petition challenging the Appellate Authority's refusal to condone a 95-day delay in filing a GST appeal. Under Section 107(1) of GST law, appeals must...

Validity of demand - order has been passed without proper notice to petitioner - Before passing any order, a personal hearing shall be given to petitioner with atleast...

HC set aside ITAT's rectification order under Section 254(2) of Income Tax Act, finding ITAT exceeded its jurisdiction in reviewing income classification. The dispute...

Challenge the order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 201(1) and 201(1A) r/w 254 after receipt of recovery notice u/s 156 - the petitioner is not remedy less as...

Rectification u/s 254 - period of limitation - ITAT does not have any power to pass an order u/s 254(2) of the Act beyond a period of six months from the end of the...

Quick Updates: