Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2019 Year 2019 This

Addition u/s 68 - Parties failed to respond to the summons - The ...


Section 68: Share Capital Genuineness Questioned; Assessee Not Penalized Due to Lack of Summons Response Request.

February 26, 2019

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Addition u/s 68 - Parties failed to respond to the summons - The issue of share premium raised by the revenue in the assessment order to doubt the genuineness of share capital raised cannot be held against the assessee as the assessee was never required to explain or justify this matter.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Addition u/s 68 - share capital issued at the premium - unexplained cash credit - Assessee has fully discharged its onus cast under section 68 of the Act and proved the...

  2. Unexplained cash credits u/s 68 were added due to assessee's failure to discharge onus regarding bogus share capital including premium receipts. Despite filing...

  3. Addition u/s 68 - share application money received as unaccounted cash credit - identity and creditworthiness of the share subscribers and genuineness of the transaction...

  4. The assessee company received share capital and share application money from 13 share applicants. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition u/s 68, alleging that the...

  5. Non-proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share premium received cannot be treated as unexplained income if sufficient documentary evidence is provided....

  6. Unexplained share capital and premium received by assessee company was its own unaccounted money flowing back in form of premium on share allotment. Assessee filed...

  7. Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share premium and share capital - the assessee has substantially provided materials to prove the genuineness of the share holders apart...

  8. The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal. The assessee furnished all evidence proving identity, creditworthiness of investors, and genuineness of transactions regarding...

  9. In a case concerning unexplained credit u/s 68, the assessee proved the identity and genuineness of share applicants, although their creditworthiness was questioned. The...

  10. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 as the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of LTCG claimed u/s 10(38). The AO found discrepancies in off-market...

  11. Addition u/s 68 - increase in share capital and share premium - As source of source is proved by the assessee in the instant case though the same is not required to be...

  12. Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share capital - Even though there were circumstances leading to suspicion, yet having taken an action u/s.132 and enquiries made in the...

  13. Addition u/s 68 - share capital and share premium - any addition which deserved to be made should have been made in the hands of the share applicants who have shown...

  14. Addition u/s 68 - Unexplained cash credit - share capital and share premium - The assessee consistently escaping from appearing before the ld. AO and the appellate...

  15. Addition u/s 68 - If the assessee is unable to explain the alleged cash credit and consistent escaped, the provisions of section 68 of the Act are rightly invoked by...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates