Excisability/movability - DG sets - immovable property or not - ...

Demand Confirmed: DG Sets Deemed Movable, Excise Duty Applicable on Goods Clearance, Not Erection.

February 27, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Excisability/movability - DG sets - immovable property or not - The duty has been demanded on the clearance of goods from the premises of the appellants and not on the act of erection of the D G Set in their premises - Demand confirmed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Excisability/movability - DG sets - immovable property or not - ...

Demand Confirmed: DG Sets Deemed Movable, Excise Duty Applicable on Goods Clearance, Not Erection.

February 27, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

SSI Exemption - value of clearances - clubbing of clearances - The tribunal found the appellants engaged in the manufacture and sale of excisable goods without Central...

Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for duty, interest, and penalty from FY 2007-08 to 2011-12 assessed. Differential duty demand of Rs....

Duty demand - collection excess duty from customers on sale of import goods - duty under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act cannot be demanded on imported custom...

Goods manufactured within Special Economic Zone (SEZ) were challenged regarding applicability of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED) and Additional Duty of Excise...

Denial of exemption benefits under Notifications 30/2004-CE and 23/2003-CE for clearances of finished goods into the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) by a 100% Export Oriented...

Demand of Differential Duty - Inclusion of value of deemed export in the value of DTA clearance of goods - wrongful determination of assessable value of finished goods -...

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

CESTAT Mumbai addressed a case involving a differential Central Excise duty demand u/s 11A(4) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant discharged the duty upon...

Interpretation of Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding the recovery of amounts collected as excise duty but not deposited with the government. The key...

Default in payment of Central Excise Duty - By making the demand as above nearly one year later, for the clearances made without payment of duty revenue was not only...

Clandestine removal demand based on electricity consumption not sustainable as mere electricity consumption cannot be the sole basis for determining duty liability....

The appellant, a telecom service provider, was disallowed CENVAT credit on services related to procurement, transportation, and filling of diesel for DG sets at cell...

The appellant paid excise duty on the removal of inputs as such, based on the transaction value. However, this excise duty was found to be in excess of the actual CENVAT...

This case deals with the applicability of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED) levied u/s 147 of the Finance Act, 2002, and Additional Duty of Excise (AED) levied as...

The appellant, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU), imported goods and stored them in a licensed warehouse u/s 58 of the Customs Act, 1962. These goods were destroyed in a...

Quick Updates: