Double jeopardy - penalty is civil in nature imposed by the ...

Double Jeopardy Argument Rejected: Civil Penalty and Criminal Action Don't Violate Article 20(2) of Indian Constitution.

April 5, 2019

Case Laws Indian Laws HC

Double jeopardy - penalty is civil in nature imposed by the statutory authority - criminal action even otherwise being not violative of Article 20(2) - argument of double jeopardy rejected.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Double jeopardy - penalty is civil in nature imposed by the ...

Double Jeopardy Argument Rejected: Civil Penalty and Criminal Action Don't Violate Article 20(2) of Indian Constitution.

April 5, 2019

Case Laws Indian Laws HC

You may also like:

Dishonor of Cheque - Ascertaining nature of transaction - whether a criminal proceeding can be initiated and an accused held guilty when there is already a civil court...

Clandestine removal - double jeopardy - Both the show cause notices have alleged different offences to have been committed by the appellants, which are punishable under...

Levy of penalty u/ss 271D and 271E was challenged - default u/ss 269SS and 269T - assessee received and repaid cash loans from directors and related concerns - assessee...

Dishonour of Cheque - civil nature dispute - The case revolves around allegations of fraudulent representation in a land transaction. The complainant asserts that the...

Money Laundering - proceeds of crime - double jeopardy - prosecuting the person accused of an offence under Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of corruption Act and for...

The High Court considered the issue of penalty levy for exporting dimensional blocks directly from unlicensed quarries u/s 11(2) of the Foreign Trade (Development and...

Criminal proceedings against the Directors - Nature of financial transactions - vicarious liability - The High court found that the allegations, if proven, constituted...

Prayer for being excused of any criminal liability and relieved of the alleged defaults complained of by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) - section 463(2) of the...

Oppression and mismanagement - maintainability of suit of appellant - Cumulatively, unless, there is specific bar excluding the jurisdiction of the civil Court on any...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Validity of the Lease Deed - Doctrine of Res Sub-Judice - Appellants argued that the Tribunal overstepped its jurisdiction by setting...

Excess utilisation of cenvat credit - Whether the appellant is liable to pay interest and penalty on account of alleged excess utilisation of cenvat credit - The demand...

Imposition of penalty u/s 10(b) r.w.s 10-A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - unauthorized use of Form C to purchase goods like valves, regulators, PP caps, aluminum...

Penalty proceedings u/s 270A - Applicable rate of penalty - The Appellate Tribunal noted that while the penalty notice cited under-reporting of income, the AO imposed...

The High Court considered a case involving bribery and criminal liability, where an individual sought provisional release for monetary gain. The court held that the...

Misclassification and Wrongful Claim of MEIS Benefits - Exports of quilts containing cotton/polyester - Levy of penalties - The CESTAT found the appellant guilty of...

Quick Updates: