Reopening u/s 147 - non disposing objections by AO before ...

Reassessment Invalid as Officer Overlooked Taxpayer's Objections in Section 147 Case.

April 13, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Reopening u/s 147 - non disposing objections by AO before proceeding with the assessment by passing a speaking order - The re-assessment cannot be sustained

View Source

← Previous Next →

Reopening u/s 147 - non disposing objections by AO before ...

Reassessment Invalid as Officer Overlooked Taxpayer's Objections in Section 147 Case.

April 13, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The ITAT Delhi held that the notice issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer u/s 148 was invalid. The jurisdiction over the assessee was with a different...

HC held that erroneous attachment of another taxpayer's information to section 148 notice due to inadvertence does not invalidate reassessment proceedings. However, the...

The High Court quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, holding it to be a case of "change of opinion" and...

The court held that the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment, as per Section 151A read with...

Territorial Jurisdiction - proper officer or not - Registration was assigned to Central GST Officer - SCN was issued by the State GST officer - the distribution of work...

Notice u/s 143(2) issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer/Deputy Commissioner is invalid and cannot be cured. The assessment order framed u/s 143(3) based on...

HC determined that typographical error in address on notice under s.148 of IT Act does not invalidate reassessment proceedings. Taxpayer's claim for India-Singapore DTAA...

Validity of order of reassessment - in order to invoke jurisdiction u/s 22(1) of the VAT Act or to initiate proceedings for reassessment there must be an order of...

Refund of CGST & SGST wrongly paid - Interpretation of the term “subsequently held” - the term “subsequently held” in section 77 of CGST Act, 2017 or under section 19 of...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Assessing Officer to usurp the jurisdiction to reopen the assessment - The first Assessing Officer has made the reassessment after...

The case involved a challenge to penalty orders u/ss 271D and 271E before the Appellate Tribunal. The issue revolved around the reassessment proceedings being quashed,...

Compulsory scrutiny - AO Jurisdiction and authority to take up the case for compulsory scrutiny - Since the conditions as prescribed in Clause D of para 3 of the...

Assessment u/s 147 versus 153C - choice of correct course of assessment. The assessee's name featured in the list of beneficiaries of accommodation entries by way of...

The High Court held that the reassessment order dated 12.05.2023 and subsequent proceedings were invalid as they were beyond the statutory limitation period prescribed...

Notice issued against dissolved firm invalid; firm ceased to exist, rendering reassessment proceedings untenable. Apex Court's decision in Maruti Suzuki case mandates...

Quick Updates: