HC determined that typographical error in address on notice ...

Typographical Error in Section 148 Notice Address Won't Invalidate IT Reassessment if Taxpayer Aware of Proceedings

February 3, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

HC determined that typographical error in address on notice under s.148 of IT Act does not invalidate reassessment proceedings. Taxpayer's claim for India-Singapore DTAA exemption without filing proper income tax return prompted IT Department's notice. Though taxpayer later filed manual return on 02.03.2022, department issued speaking order without considering CBDT Circular 3/2016. Court set aside speaking order dated 18.03.2022 and remanded matter, directing authorities to provide taxpayer reasonable opportunity to present case in light of CBDT Circular 3/2016. Mere address error on notice to Verizon Services Singapore Pte Ltd. (incorrectly sent to Visteon Tax Office, Michigan) does not render proceedings invalid.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC determined that typographical error in address on notice ...

Typographical Error in Section 148 Notice Address Won't Invalidate IT Reassessment if Taxpayer Aware of Proceedings

February 3, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Validity of reassessment order - Notice sent on wrong (old) E-mail ID - The petitioner company had two email addresses, one used until 2019 and another operational since...

Validity of the assessment framed u/s 147 - Proof of service of notice - There was no valid service of notice u/s 148 of the Act in the present case. The finding of the...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of notice being sent to the wrong address, leading to an ex-parte order by the CIT(A) due to improper service. The CIT(A)...

Reassessment action initiated based on Section 148 notice and subsequent Section 148A(b) notice violated the First Proviso to Section 149(1) and was barred by the...

Validity of notice - Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - In the present case, there is an in advertent error in the notice issued by the AO reflecting only the PAN column...

Reassessment - notice served at old address - the new address was very much available on the record of the Assessing Officer on which earlier notices u/s 143(2) dated 22....

Jurisdiction of AO in framing assessment - The assessee’s address was obtained from the bank records in which the assessee has given address of Delhi and on the same...

Validity of notice issued u/s 148 - service of notice at an address obtained from bank account - when the Department had correct address of the assessee, sending notice...

Non service of notice u/s 143(2) - Apparently, the notice was sent on the wrong address as the assessee has categorically given his address in the relevant return of...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Issuing of notice u/s 148 in the wrong name - it was only a typographical error in first name of the assessee though other...

Validity of reassessment proceedings - non-service of notice u/s 148A(b) through e-mail - Denial of principle of natural justice - The High Court examined the evidence...

Validity of reopening an assessment and the legality of issuing a new Show Cause Notice u/s 148-A(b) after the conclusion of initial reassessment proceedings. The key...

Service of SCN - SCN not sent at proper address - The department was fully aware that the appellant is not residing and not available in the address - After the Show...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non appearance before the Assessing Officer - AO kept an issuing notices on the wrong address even when the first notice was not served...

Reassessment u/s 147 - validity of notice - reasons for reopening the assessment have been recorded by the jurisdictional AO viz. the Dy. CIT, Circle 2, Jamnagar but the...

Quick Updates: