Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2019 Year 2019 This

Rectification u/s 254 - non-consideration of decision of ...


Tribunal Must Rectify Error u/s 254 for Ignoring High Court Precedent in Identical Case.

April 26, 2019

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Rectification u/s 254 - non-consideration of decision of tribunal relied upon by the assessee on identical fact - decision subsequently approved by Hon’ble Bombay High Court and revenue’s SLP dismissed by Hon’ble Apex Court - non-consideration of binding judicial precedent of High Court would constitute mistake apparent from record

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Rectification application u/s 254 - Tribunal not followed the decision on the identical facts by the Coordinate Bench which is confirmed by this Court - The Court...

  2. Rectification u/s 254 - Addition u/s 68 - non-consideration of certain facts in Order of the Tribunal - ignoring the material already on record on the part of the...

  3. Rectification u/s 254 - The High Court acknowledges that the Tribunal is the final authority to ascertain facts. However, it must rectify any apparent mistakes in its...

  4. Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - If such prayer is allowed then in every case, where the assessee is not satisfied with the finding of the Tribunal, the MA will be...

  5. The Tribunal held that in a case involving a requisition u/s 132A of the Act, the jurisdiction to complete the assessment is governed by the provisions of Section 153A....

  6. Power of tribunal u/s 254 to rectify an order - The Tribunal travelled far beyond its power of rectification in accepting the assessee’s various contentions which were...

  7. Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - failure to consider an argument advanced by either party for arriving at a conclusion is not an error apparent on the record, although...

  8. Special Drive Fortnight to rectify errors relating to IGST refunds.

  9. Rectification u/s 254 - non consideration of Tribunal decision in order which was referred and provided in paper book - an apparent error requiring necessary...

  10. The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case regarding rectification u/s 254 related to Compensation under BTALA. The Tribunal found the applicant's attempt for...

  11. Error apparent on record rectified by allowing Revenue's appeal instead of wrongly dismissing it, as logical conclusion of upholding Revenue's contentions. Rectification...

  12. Assessee filed second rectification application u/s 254, raising same grounds as first miscellaneous application which was already rejected. Tribunal held that except...

  13. Rectification u/s 254 - Maintainability of appeal on low tax effect - both CBDT Circular no. 23 of 2019 and special order dated 16.09.2019 were not in existence and thus...

  14. Rectification u/s 254 - Both CBDT Circular no. 23 of 2019 and special order dated 16.09.2019 were not in existence and thus not part of the record at the time when the...

  15. Grant of export incentives under Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) - seeking reopening of online portal to allow the petitioner to rectify the inadvertent...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates