Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2019 Year 2019 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - claim of depreciation at 10% is under ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

May 17, 2019

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - claim of depreciation at 10% is under the bonafide belief that the residential quarters were utilized for the hospital purpose and formed part and parcel of hospital premises - mere making of a bonafide claim would not amount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income - no penalty - no substantial question of law arises

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bonafide belief - restriction of claim of deduction u/s 80IC to 25% from 100% claimed on account of substantial expansion - differing orders...

  2. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – assessee has bonafide belief in making the claim that gain arising out of sale of agricultural land is exempt from tax - no penalty - AT

  4. Penalty for concealment of income u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act - Claim of capital loss as bad debt - bonafide belief - no penalty - HC

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of excessive depreciation - cost of acquisition of wind mill - whether or not assessee is entitled to the benefit under proviso to...

  6. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) claimed in the original return and later in the return filed in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act,...

  7. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

  8. Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because assessee claimed depreciation at 25% treating items to be plant, which claim was not acceptable to revenue, would not by itself...

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Held that:- Wrongful claim of depreciation - The attempts made by the assessee are indicative of frivolous nature of claim - penalty confirmed - AT

  11. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - surrendered undisclosed income during the search and seizure - assessee contented that income disclosed in the return U/s 139(1) though claimed...

  12. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Claim of exemption u/s 10(38) where no STT was paid - the assessee having not disclosed fully and truly all the material facts relevant to the...

  13. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

  14. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - deduction u/s. 80GGC denied - second round of appeal - the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the claim for deduction was...

  15. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - deduction claimed u/s 80IA - there being no factual basis for establishing that the expenses needed to be allocated and the expenses so...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates