Oppression and mismanagement - not permitted/given sufficient ...

Allegations of oppression and mismanagement in company; independent Chairman appointed amid investigation by Registrar and Income Tax.

May 18, 2019

Case Laws Companies Law Tri

Oppression and mismanagement - not permitted/given sufficient opportunity to be involved in the affairs/board meetings - allotment of shares at par without premium to Respondent and at premium to the Petitioners and no action was taken to rectify it - pending investigation with ROC & DIT(I) - sufficient to hold acts of oppression and mismanagement - appointed interim arrangement by appointing independent Chairman to see the affairs of the Company

View Source

← Previous Next →

Oppression and mismanagement - not permitted/given sufficient ...

Allegations of oppression and mismanagement in company; independent Chairman appointed amid investigation by Registrar and Income Tax.

May 18, 2019

Case Laws Companies Law Tri

You may also like:

Mintainability of a company petition u/s 399 of the Companies Act, 1956, focusing on the pre-conditions envisaged under sub-sections (1) and (3). It examines whether the...

Oppression and Mismanagement - once the Company against which the aforesaid application has been filed by the appellant on the allegation that there is mismanagement in...

The crux of the matter revolves around allegations of oppression, mismanagement, illegal sale of company land, allotment of equity shares, appointment and removal of...

Oppression and mismanagement - the Tribunal has the power to make Interim Orders which it thinks fit for regulation of the conduct of the affairs of the Company -...

Oppression and Mismanagement - This ‘Tribunal’ keeping in mind of the ingredients of Section 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 comes to a resultant conclusion that...

Oppression and mismanagement - Removal of Director - Period of limitation - Time gap of 5 years - The petition filed by the petitioner is prima facie barred by...

Oppression and mismanagement - Determination of minimum shareholding for filing complain / petition against the company - The ‘onus’, to establish ‘Membership’ is on the...

Oppression and Mismanagement - The appellants are critical of the Special Officer appointed by the learned National Company Law Tribunal (who was appointed to ensure...

Oppression and Mismanagement - bogus transactions - siphoning of funds - The allegation is an isolated incident and in order to invoke provisions of Oppression and...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Transfer of Shares - allotment of shares - Forum Shopping - It is clear that even as on 1998, there was no business conducted by the...

Oppression and Mismanagement - minority shareholders - There was no alternative except liquidation or revival of company through other modes including sale of assets to...

Winding up order - The Company was non-functional, it had already given its premises on rent and it was the only income of the Company. Therefore, we find that the...

Refusal to appoint an arbitrator and refer the dispute to the arbitrator - The dispute is with respect to the Share Subscription and Shareholders Agreement which is...

Oppression and Mismanagement - illegal allotment of shares - the allegations that there has been an illegal allotment of Petitioner's shares, exclusion of Petitioner...

Oppression and mismanagement - Holding BOD meetings outside India - Nothing is shown that there is any restriction on the place where Board of Directors should hold...

Quick Updates: