Appeal u/s 35-G of the Central Excise Act - The order of the ...

Appeal u/s 35-G of Central Excise Act dismissed; no substantial question of law found, order upheld by CESTAT.

May 30, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise HC

Appeal u/s 35-G of the Central Excise Act - The order of the adjudicating authority is a reasoned and well considered order analysing the evidence adduced before him - concurrent findings of fact recorded by both the original adjudicating authority, and the CESTAT affirming the order of the adjudicating authority, do not suffer from any such infirmity - no substantial question of law arises

View Source

← Previous Next →

Appeal u/s 35-G of the Central Excise Act - The order of the ...

Appeal u/s 35-G of Central Excise Act dismissed; no substantial question of law found, order upheld by CESTAT.

May 30, 2019

Case Laws Central Excise HC

You may also like:

The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of short-term loss claimed by the assessee in the Profit and Loss Account, holding that the shares were acquired under a normal...

Jurisdiction of civil court u/s 34 of SARFAESI Act was in question. Suit for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction was rejected by lower courts under Order...

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the assessing officer against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, holding that no substantial question of law...

Substantial question of law to be made out u/s 260A or not? - Undisclosed income surrendered during the Search and Seizure action - to be taxed at normal rate or tax...

Addition u/s 68 - substantial question of law - The Supreme court has held that, the jurisdiction of the High Court to interfere with the orders passed by the Courts...

Substantial question of law to be made u/s 260A - prerequisite of admission of the appeal before the High court - The ITAT hold that the assessee had correctly offered...

Hearing of appeal by High Court - appeal heard on merit without framing questions, on the basis of questions of law raised in appeal - The appeals are remanded to the...

The case pertains to additions made by the Assessing Officer on account of bogus share application money and commission for bogus accommodation entries. The ITAT deleted...

Validity of the decision High Court deciding the appeal on admission state itself on merit - The Supreme Court observed that while the High Court had framed certain...

HC upheld CESTAT's decision against cancellation of customs broker license. While KYC documents were submitted, the Department alleged unexplained procurement methods...

Maintainability of appeal - time limitation - appeal filed before Commissioner (Appeals) after a delay of 11 months - More time has been taken by the department for...

Validity of Appeal filed by AOP having PAN issued as Individual - CIT(A) did not adjudicate the issue on merits in accordance with the provisions of section 250(6) of...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal u/s 35(1) - The power to condone the delay conferred upon the Commissioner (Appeals) ends if the appeal is preferred after 30 days...

100% EOU - Debonding of EOU - Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) dismissed the appeal on the ground that, the petitioner had sought to invoke the provisions of Section 35...

Validity of Judgement of High Court - While admitting the appeal of the Revenue, the High Court has framed 10 question of laws - However, while disposing the appeal, the...

Quick Updates: