Oppression and mismanagement - member - When the Respondent No.1 ...

Shareholder Dispute: Alleged Secret Transfer and Forgery Leads to Claims of Oppression and Mismanagement in Company.

June 4, 2019

Case Laws Companies Law AT

Oppression and mismanagement - member - When the Respondent No.1 being a shareholder with 25% shareholding at the time of incorporation and also being one of the founding Directors of the Company is admitted, it cannot be contended that he ceased to be a “member” upon reduction of his share capital and that too when the transfer of shareholding is alleged to be clandestine and product of fabrication and forgery

View Source

← Previous Next →

Oppression and mismanagement - member - When the Respondent No.1 ...

Shareholder Dispute: Alleged Secret Transfer and Forgery Leads to Claims of Oppression and Mismanagement in Company.

June 4, 2019

Case Laws Companies Law AT

You may also like:

Corporate dispute involving allegations of oppression and mismanagement by equal shareholders. Key points: Oppression implies lack of probity or equity, intention behind...

The NCLAT held that disputes related to shareholder oppression or mismanagement under the Companies Act are distinct from the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and...

Oppression and mismanagement case - Transfer of 2500 shares by deceased challenged by appellant claiming legal heirs entitled to shares or fair price. Held: Appellant's...

Oppression and Mismanagement - minority shareholders - There was no alternative except liquidation or revival of company through other modes including sale of assets to...

Refusal to appoint an arbitrator and refer the dispute to the arbitrator - The dispute is with respect to the Share Subscription and Shareholders Agreement which is...

Writ appeal against writ petition entertained by the Ld. Single Judge - private parties - mismanagement and oppression of majority shareholders - Material on record...

Gain/loss on sale of shares - legal nature of the transaction - As per companies Act shareholder and company both are two separate legal person capable of holding...

The petition alleges oppression and mismanagement by the company's majority shareholders against the petitioners, who were removed as directors through an Extraordinary...

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) held that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has wide powers under the Companies Act and NCLT Rules, 2016 to...

This case pertains to penalties imposed for alleged violation of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA), 1973. The respondent claimed the appellant transferred...

There are certain oppression and mismanagement. The relationship between the Majority Shareholders & Minority Shareholders are strained. Hence, there is a need for...

NCLAT dismissed the appeal, upholding the NCLT's discretionary waiver of eligibility criteria under Section 244(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013. The tribunal considered...

The Adjudicating Authority rightly rejected the petition filed u/s 9 of the Code due to a pre-existing dispute between the parties. The Corporate Debtor raised a...

Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(c)(ii) - allotment of shares to assessee shareholder at a value lower - whether Tax to be paid by the shareholders or the company? - The shares...

Initiation of CIRP process - application was rejected on the ground that the claim of the Appellant falls within the ambit of disputed claim - Merely disputing a claim...

Quick Updates: