Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - tax u/s 115JB - assessee’s claim was ...

Court Rules No Penalty for Assessee; Auditor Responsible for Incorrect Claim u/ss 271(1)(c) and 115JB.

June 6, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - tax u/s 115JB - assessee’s claim was that it was falling u/s 115JA and duly supported by the certificate of the auditors - If the claim was wrong the responsibility was that of the auditor who duly certified the same - assessee cannot be visited with penalty for the mistake of its consultant/auditor - no penalty

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - tax u/s 115JB - assessee’s claim was ...

Court Rules No Penalty for Assessee; Auditor Responsible for Incorrect Claim u/ss 271(1)(c) and 115JB.

June 6, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

This case deals with the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, imposed for disallowance of losses on forex derivatives treated as speculative losses and...

No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed on the assessee for disallowance of depreciation. The ITAT held that the assessee did not deliberately claim depreciation with an...

MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Penalty u/s 271(1) - addition of wrong claim u/s 80IB made by assessee in the return & surrendered during scrutiny proceedings - such claim is solely based on the report...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - deduction u/s. 80GGC denied - second round of appeal - the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the claim for deduction was...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed for denying deduction u/s 80DD for a disabled person with over 80% disability. The assessee, a retired individual, had submitted...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The Revenue argued that the assessee's actions constituted furnishing inaccurate particulars of income or concealing income. However, the High...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when the assessee company had been assessed to tax under the deeming provisions of Sec. 115JB of the Act, therefore, on the basis of our...

The case involved a dispute over penalty imposition u/ss 271(1)(c) versus 271(1B) for additions related to estimated income from share trading transactions. The...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed as the assessee did not make disallowance u/s 14A or compute income for administrative/indirect common expenses incurred in relation to...

Quick Updates: