Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2019 Year 2019 This

Penalty u/s 78 of the FA, 1994 - appellant had correctly advised ...


Appellant penalized u/s 78 of Finance Act, 1994, for failing to remit service tax, showing mala fide intent.

June 15, 2019

Case Laws     Service Tax     HC

Penalty u/s 78 of the FA, 1994 - appellant had correctly advised not to challenged the invocation of the extended period of limitation for recovery of service tax though the parameters/conditions for imposing equivalent penalty u/s 78 is same - appellant after having recovered the service tax from its customer had not paid over the amount to the State clearly point to mala fide conduct - penalty upheld

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

  2. Services rendered by appellant classified as works contract services, attracting service tax liability. Appellant failed to obtain service tax registration and pay...

  3. Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

  4. The CESTAT held that the demand of Rs.80,61,111/- (including Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess) raised on the ground of difference between the...

  5. Levy of penalty u/s 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - evasion of service tax - appellant collected service tax from the service receivers but failed to deposit the...

  6. CESTAT ruled in favor of appellant regarding service tax liability on GTA services during 2008-2013. The Tribunal determined service tax liability shifted to service...

  7. The appellant's appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal, and the penalty imposed u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, was set aside. It was held that when an assessee...

  8. Levy of penalty u/s 78 of FA - allegation of evasion of service tax - The assessee being a public sector undertaking of the Government of India is an additional factor...

  9. Non-payment of service tax - Double Taxation - Service receiver had already discharged the service tax liability - The Appellate Tribunal acknowledged that the service...

  10. The case pertains to the classification of services provided by M/s Intelsat to the respondent as either 'Telecommunication Services' or 'Support Services for Business...

  11. Extended period of limitation - Demand of Service Tax - It appears that non-payment of service tax could be on account of the belief that no service tax was payable in...

  12. Levy of Service Tax - rendering cleaning service mostly to non- commercial organizations, government hospitals, educational institutes - As the cleaning service has been...

  13. Service tax demand and interest were raised on the amount towards provident fund. Penalties u/ss 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were imposed. The extended...

  14. Levy of Service Tax - leasing of the land of Kandla Port Trust - The show cause notice was issued only for demand of interest and penalty and there is no demand of...

  15. Penalty u/s 78 - suppression with intent to evade payment of service tax - appellant has immediately paid the amount of service tax alongwith interest - It shows that...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates