Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2019 Year 2019 This

Penalty u/s 78 of the FA, 1994 - appellant had correctly advised ...

Case Laws     Service Tax

June 15, 2019

Penalty u/s 78 of the FA, 1994 - appellant had correctly advised not to challenged the invocation of the extended period of limitation for recovery of service tax though the parameters/conditions for imposing equivalent penalty u/s 78 is same - appellant after having recovered the service tax from its customer had not paid over the amount to the State clearly point to mala fide conduct - penalty upheld

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Invocation of Extended period of limitation u/s 78(1) of FA - Department was at all times during the period for which the demand has been raised were aware of the...

  2. Invocation of extended period of limitation - Extended period is applicable in the present appeal even if waiver from Section 78 penalty has been extended to the...

  3. Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

  4. Extended period of limitation - demand of service tax - invocation of Section 80 ibid cannot necessary imply that there was no suppression or wilful mis-statement. Once...

  5. Invocation of extended period of limitation - Levy of interest u/s 75 and penalty u/s 78 - the appellant is working as a nodal agency for the Government Project(s) and...

  6. Jurisdiction of Commissioner - Commissioner under his revisionary power has issued SCN, imposing penalty, by invoking extended period of limitation - Penalty u/s 76, 77...

  7. Benefit of reduced penalty - penalty not deposited - get the benefit of reduced penalty of 25% of the service tax (ST) u/s 78(1) of the FA, 1994, assessee required to...

  8. Invocation of extended period of limitation - activity of direct selling agent on commission basis - The non-payment of service tax was purely a bona fide unawarenss...

  9. Reduction of penalty u/s 78 of FA - non-payment of service tax - appellant has not recorded the said transactions in their specified records - Penalty reduced to 50% of...

  10. Penalty u/s 76, 77 and 78 of FA - No malafide can be attributed to the respondent, who is organized under Government of India - No penalty.

  11. Service tax demand and interest were raised on the amount towards provident fund. Penalties u/ss 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were imposed. The extended...

  12. Since the penalties imposed under Section 76 is upheld, penalties imposed under Section 78 cannot be justified, Hence the penalties imposed u/s 78 is set aside - In the...

  13. Eligibility to CENVAT Credit - Invocation of extended period of limitation - when the issue of eligibility of credit was in dispute during the impugned period, the...

  14. Penalty u/s 78 of FA - even if the appellant subsequently pays the amount on being pointed out by the department, along with interest, imposition of penalty under...

  15. Penalty u/s 70, 77 and 78 of FA - non-filing of ST-3 return would not amount to suppression of facts, with intent to defraud Government revenue, unless it is...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates