Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2019 Year 2019 This

Invocation of Extended period of limitation u/s 78(1) of FA - ...


Extended Limitation Under Finance Act Section 78(1) Challenged; No Fact Suppression Found, Limitation Not Invoked.

June 15, 2019

Case Laws     Service Tax     HC

Invocation of Extended period of limitation u/s 78(1) of FA - Department was at all times during the period for which the demand has been raised were aware of the declaration made by the respondent that they will not be liable to pay the service tax on 41% levy collected from the contractee and paid over to the Grocerty Market and Shop Board - no suppression of facts to invoke the extended period of limitation

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. HC determined that invoking extended limitation period under First Proviso to Section 73(1) of Finance Act 1994 was unjustified. Following P&B Pharmaceuticals and...

  2. Invoking the extended period of limitation u/s 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act for recovery of unpaid duty. The key points are: The department alleged suppression of...

  3. Validity of SCN - Levy of Penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act on CHA - abetment of offence committed by the importer as against which the petitioner - scope of Sections...

  4. Failure to produce supporting documents before audit team does not constitute suppression of facts to invoke extended period of limitation u/s 73(1) of Finance Act, 1994....

  5. The key points are: Appropriation of Rs. 11,00,000 deposited under protest during investigation cannot be considered as acceptance of liability. The extended period of...

  6. Invocation of extended period of limitation under proviso to section 73(1) of Finance Act, 1994 requires wilful suppression of facts with intent to evade service tax...

  7. Extended period of Limitation - suppression of relevant facts or not - We fail to understand that when the Assessee had changed its method of valuation on the advice of...

  8. The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation of five years under proviso to Section 73(1) of the Finance Act could not have been invoked in the present case....

  9. Extended period of limitation - Suppression of facts or not - The returns contained all the requisite details as that of the invoice numbers, the amount of invoice, the...

  10. Extended period of limitation - Once it is found that there was absence of mis-declaration or suppression facts which finding attained finality between the parties...

  11. Central excise duty exemption notification dated 01.03.2002 was denied, leading to recovery of duty, interest, and penalty. The extended period of limitation was invoked....

  12. Appellant challenged levy of service tax on commission paid to foreign agents for export of goods during Sep 2013-Sep 2014 under reverse charge, denial of CENVAT credit,...

  13. Invocation of extended period of limitation - wilful suppression of facts - Even suppression of facts has to be wilful and in any case, suppression has also to be with...

  14. Penalty - Suppression of facts or not - Extend period of limitation - Service tax paid on Reverse Charge Mechanism and credit was availed even after issuance of SCN -...

  15. This case pertains to the utilization of ineligible CENVAT credit by a company. The key points are: The company availed ineligible CENVAT credit amounting to Rs....

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates