Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition of peak cash credit - sale and ...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Overturned Due to Lack of Evidence for Inaccurate Income Details in Old Vehicle Sales.

June 25, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition of peak cash credit - sale and purchase of old vehicles - addition confirmed by the CIT(A) on the basis of estimation/preponderance of possibilities of introducing some unaccounted income into the bank account - there was no reliable or un-rebutted evidences on the file to prove that the assessee had actually furnished inaccurate particulars of income or concealed particulars of his income - no penalty

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition of peak cash credit - sale and ...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Overturned Due to Lack of Evidence for Inaccurate Income Details in Old Vehicle Sales.

June 25, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act is leviable to be imposed only where the assessee has concealed its particulars of income or furnished...

Validity of the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) or 158BFA - AO has levied the penalty under section 271(1)(C) of the Act by observing that the assessee has concealed/furnished...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) involved an addition based on estimation by the Assessing Officer, which was later re-estimated by the CIT(A) to disallow 10% of the...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of excessive depreciation - cost of acquisition of wind mill - whether or not assessee is entitled to the benefit under proviso to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income was declared in survey u/s 133A - date of filing of return u/s 139(1) had not expired - The fact of “concealment of income” and...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Once, all the documentary evidences were produced before the AO and sales are no doubted, it is doubtful, whether the purchases are bogus...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - Basis adopted during the assessment proceedings cannot be used in the penalty proceedings without following the due process. As such, to...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

The assessee challenged the penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) for short credit of sale consideration received from the sale of copyrights and cable rights. The issue...

Defective notice issued u/s 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) for levying penalty. The key points are: The phrases "conceal" and "furnishing of inaccurate particulars" in...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Quick Updates: