Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - accepted quantum addition - in penalty ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 15, 2019

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - accepted quantum addition - in penalty proceedings he offer explanation that the jewellery found during search were already offered to tax in the VDIS, 1997 - quantum assessment as well as the penalty proceedings are independent of each other - the explanation offered should be tested for its correctness and only if it is found to be palpably false or not acceptable, then the question of imposing the penalty would arise.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - accepted quantum addition - in penalty ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 15, 2019

You may also like:

Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Failure of the assessee to explain the source of cash deposit in the bank account - burden of proof - The ITAT acknowledged the...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - As the penalty proceedings are distinct and independent to the quantum proceedings, in our considered view, penalty cannot be levied merely on...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Any addition/disallowances made during the quantum proceedings does not automatically justify the levy of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) -...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

Levy of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) in case of voluntary surrender of income - disallowance of claim of loss - Assessee offered the loss voluntarily to avoid litigation and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - there is no ‘tax sought to be evaded’, in terms of Explanation 4 to section 271(1)(c), on which penalty could be levied - even as the asessee has...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - loan from friends and relatives for financing his son’s USA visa - when the evidences and explanation furnished in support of cash credits are...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice - non specification of charge - Notice as barred by limitation u/s 275 - mere non-acceptance of the explanation so...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Assessing Officer has to record satisfaction before initiating penalty proceedings and the penalty proceedings are subject to...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - Scope of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act cannot be widened later to include within its scope such additions which were not...

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - It cannot be said that assessee has concealed the particular income with the meaning of section 271(1)(c) of the Act or there is not deep...

Quick Updates: