Clandestine removal - The cross examination of tempo driver was ...

Case Laws Central Excise

July 18, 2019

Clandestine removal - The cross examination of tempo driver was already allowed earlier and therefore there was no reason for the adjudicating authority to grant cross examination again and again and cannot be considered to be violative of principles of natural justice.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Clandestine removal - The cross examination of tempo driver was ...

Case Laws Central Excise

July 18, 2019

You may also like:

Clandestine removal of excisable goods alleged based on statements recorded from partners, employees, and buyers. Section 9D of Central Excise Act mandates...

The case pertains to the allegation of clandestine manufacture and clearance of structural items/rolled products by the appellant. The revenue's case rested solely on...

Clandestine removal demand based on electrical consumption was challenged. Average electricity consumption for certain periods was calculated. Cross-examination of...

Dishonor of Cheque - seeking cross examination of the complainant officer of the bank - In the present application the recall, re-cross examination of the complainant is...

Clandestine removal - consumption of electricity - the charge of clandestine removal is to be established on examination of facts of each case and not merely on the...

Violation of principles of natural justice - denial of cross-examination - revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed by...

Misdeclaration of description and value - Validity of test report - Cross examination of Chemical Examiner - In the present matter, refusal to allow cross-examination of...

Violation of principles of natural justice - From the statutory provision of section 138 B, it is not the option for the Adjudicating Authority to allow or not to allow...

Denial of cross-examination process of witness - ACIT restricted cross examination process by denying the questions asked by the Petitioner during cross examination -...

Seeking cross-examination of two persons whose statements were relied upon while issuing the SCN - Cross-examination allowed - HC

Clandestine removal - MS Ingots - the findings of clandestine removal cannot be upheld based upon the third party documents, unless there is clinching evidence of...

Clandestine Removal - statements recorded by Revenue - The Commissioner has clearly ignored this findings and come to a difference conclusion. While doing so he is...

Clandestine Removal - As per the provisions of section 9D it is clear that during adjudication, the adjudicating authority is required to first examine the witness in...

Clandestine Removal - threshold limit of SSI Exemption - third party evidences reliable or not - It is settled that statements of dealers and transporters and the...

Clandestine removal - In terms of Section 9D referred above, cross examination is necessary to establish the relevance of statements recorded during the investigation...

Quick Updates: