Clandestine Removal - threshold limit of SSI Exemption - third ...

Evidence from Dealers and Transporters Unreliable Without Cross-Examination: Central Excise Act Section 9 Compliance Essential.

October 14, 2021

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Clandestine Removal - threshold limit of SSI Exemption - third party evidences reliable or not - It is settled that statements of dealers and transporters and the documents recovered from them cannot be relied upon as evidence since, no cross examination have been carried out by the adjudicating authority from the dealers and transporters as mandated under Section 9 of the Central Excise Act therefore, without cross examination neither the statements nor the documents recovered from transporter and dealers can be relied upon - Demand with penalties set aside - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Clandestine Removal - threshold limit of SSI Exemption - third ...

Evidence from Dealers and Transporters Unreliable Without Cross-Examination: Central Excise Act Section 9 Compliance Essential.

October 14, 2021

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

This case pertains to an alleged offense under FEMA involving bogus purported exports with inflated invoices to obtain export benefits, where the goods never reached the...

Principles of Natural Justice - Levy of Penalty - It is no doubt true that there is no right of cross-examination if sufficient corroborative evidence exists, but in the...

Denial of cross-examination process of witness - ACIT restricted cross examination process by denying the questions asked by the Petitioner during cross examination -...

The case pertains to the allegation of clandestine manufacture and clearance of structural items/rolled products by the appellant. The revenue's case rested solely on...

Principles of natural justice - rejection of cross-examination - The petitioner has approached this Court prematurely as the respondents have only rejected the request...

Violation of principles of natural justice - opportunity for cross-examination. Evidentiary value of statements recorded u/s 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be...

Violation of principles of natural justice - denial of cross-examination - revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed by...

Levy of penalty u/r 25 of CER - Penalty on Registered Dealers, Unregistered Dealers and Transporters - Availment of fraudulent credit - issuance of Cenvatable invoices...

Validity of reassessment order u/s 147 - Denial of Cross-Examination Opportunity - Reliance of statement of third party - The High Court noted that the petitioner did...

Dishonor of Cheque - seeking cross examination of the complainant officer of the bank - In the present application the recall, re-cross examination of the complainant is...

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside the impugned order and remanded the cases back to the adjudicating authority. The appellants...

The ITAT Indore addressed unexplained cash investment for property purchase post search operation. Addition without cross-examination was challenged. The Tribunal...

The summary focuses on the rejection of cross-examination of DRI officers and a co-noticee by the competent authority. The main objective of cross-examination is to...

Levy of penalty u/r 26 on the Director of the company - Allegation of Clandestine removal of goods - The Tribunal observed that the statement of an employee, admitting...

Seizure of tobacco and loss of the same due to file - Liability of central excise department - Whether the Trial Court has committed error of facts and law in passing...

Quick Updates: