Validity of Declaration made under Income Declaration Scheme, ...

No Hearing Required Before IDS Submission Voided for Misrepresentation u/s 193 of Finance Act 2016.

August 26, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Validity of Declaration made under Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 (‘IDS’) - opportunity of hearing - misrepresentation or suppression of facts - there is no provision as such in the IDS to afford the declarant a hearing prior to passing an order holding such declaration to be void for being in contravention of Section 193 of the FA, 2016

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of Declaration made under Income Declaration Scheme, ...

No Hearing Required Before IDS Submission Voided for Misrepresentation u/s 193 of Finance Act 2016.

August 26, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Validity of demand - order has been passed without proper notice to petitioner - Before passing any order, a personal hearing shall be given to petitioner with atleast...

Declaration by misrepresentation of facts to be void - THE INCOME DECLARATION SCHEME, 2016 - where a declaration has been made by misrepresentation or suppression of...

Validity of reopening of assessment - Re-opening notice u/s 148A(d) - personal hearing refused - the High court concluded that Section 148A(b) does not mandate a...

Condonation of delay of 193 days in filing appeal - The ‘time spent’ in prosecuting the legal remedy by the Petitioner/Appellant/Bank is required to be excluded while...

Recovery notices and bank attachment orders - No opportunity of being heard - discrepancies between the GSTR 3B return and the GSTR 2B return - The High Court observed...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - PCIT failed to specify the transaction on which initiation of penalty either under section 271D or 271E was warranted. And on the issues of...

Application under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (DTVSV Act). - Seeking Adjust/give credit to the amount paid by petitioner under the Income Declaration Scheme,...

Ex post facto approval granted to a respondent for foreign investment violated principles of natural justice. A committee was constituted to examine rival contentions,...

The High Court quashed refund rejection orders for lack of opportunity for personal hearing as mandated by Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017, violating principles of...

Scope of pronouncing of judgement - The law does not permit that the case is heard by one entity and the order is pronounced by another who has not heard the case at all....

Non deduction of tax at source in respect of interest on debenture u/s 193 - Mere because of Provision made in the books of account as per Accounting Standards, where ...

HC quashed GST assessment order dated 22.04.2024 for violation of natural justice principles under Section 75(4) of GST Act, 2017. Despite petitioner filing two detailed...

No doubt a party may choose to waive the right to be heard and instead choose to rely only on written submissions - it is the duty of the adjudicating authorities to...

Violation of principles of natural justice - non-grant of opportunity of hearing - last hearing was virtual hearing granted only to main noticee with respect to only one...

TP Adjustment - selection of MAM - CUP method or TNMM - it is not the case of the Petitioner that a hearing was not held. In fact, the Petitioners have averred that on...

Quick Updates: