Penalty u/s 271(1) (c) - limitation - service to CIT (Judicial) ...

Delay in Dispatching ITAT Order to CIT Cannot Circumvent Penalty Limitation Period u/s 271(1)(c.

August 26, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Penalty u/s 271(1) (c) - limitation - service to CIT (Judicial) - the mandatory period of limitation u/s 275(1)(a) cannot be sought to be defeated by delaying the dispatch of the relevant order of the ITAT to the concerned ‘jurisdictional’ CIT - what is relevant is when the CIT(Judicial) representing the Department before the ITAT received the order - the impugned penalty orders are clearly without jurisdiction

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1) (c) - limitation - service to CIT (Judicial) ...

Delay in Dispatching ITAT Order to CIT Cannot Circumvent Penalty Limitation Period u/s 271(1)(c.

August 26, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - limitation period u/s 275(1)(a) - limitation begins to run from the date of the order of the ITAT was served upon the CIT (Judicial) - penalty...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Penalty u/s 271AAA or 271(1)(c) - The penalties u/s 271(1)(c) and 271AAA are attracted in different situations and both are mutually exclusive. Having initiated the...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - Scope of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act cannot be widened later to include within its scope such additions which were not...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Limitation period u/s 275(1)(a) -hile deciding the question of limitation as mentioned in the section, penalty order passed by the AO was...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition u/s 68 - Penalty has been levied in a mechanical manner without application of mind. In our view, this is a serious mistake in the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - combined order of penalty for additions made vide order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. u/s 153A and u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 - AO required to initiate two...

Quick Updates: