Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Scrutiny under CASS - the ...

Penalty Confirmed: Section 271(1)(c) Scrutiny Finds Assessee Couldn't Prove Legitimacy of Cash Deposits in Partnership Firm.

September 16, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Scrutiny under CASS - the assessee failed to prove the creditworthiness of the cash deposits (Capital) in the partnership firm and therefore was no illegality in the orders - Levy of penalty confirmed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Scrutiny under CASS - the ...

Penalty Confirmed: Section 271(1)(c) Scrutiny Finds Assessee Couldn't Prove Legitimacy of Cash Deposits in Partnership Firm.

September 16, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Unexplained cash payments - There is also no evidence to suggest that cash withdrawn from ETLL was unused and kept with the assessee idle though repeatedly withdrawals...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Unexplained money u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE(1) - no explanation regarding source of cash deposit in savings account - case selected for limited scrutiny, thus...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the penalty imposed u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) was not legally valid. The Assessing Officer failed to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of excessive depreciation - cost of acquisition of wind mill - whether or not assessee is entitled to the benefit under proviso to...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(C) - exemption u/s 80-IC - income in the garb of fictitious cash sales - Assessing Officer as well as the Appellate Authority, rightly gave...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is not leviable on additional income offered by the assessee in response to a notice issued u/s 148, as held in Kirit Dahyabhai Patel and Ravi Sud...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Failure of the assessee to explain the source of cash deposit in the bank account - burden of proof - The ITAT acknowledged the...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

Scope of limited scrutiny - cash deposits in the Bank accounts being more than the turnover - The impugned addition made by the AO on account of profit allegedly earned...

The crux pertains to levying penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for alleged furnishing of inaccurate particulars or concealment of income regarding capital gains computation on sale...

Quick Updates: