Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2019 Year 2019 This

PCIT has rightly invoked extraordinary revisionary powers as are ...


PCIT Rightly Used Revisionary Powers u/s 263 Due to AO's Inadequate Inquiry on HUF Interest Deduction.

October 29, 2019

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

PCIT has rightly invoked extraordinary revisionary powers as are enshrined in Section 263 as no inquiry, verifications and ivestiigations were made by the AO before allowing deduction of interest expenditure payments to HUF. It is not brought on record by the AO whether Karta is partner in his individual capacity albeit representing HUF or instead HUF is partner in the assessee firm directly

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The assessee borrowed loans from financial institutions at an interest rate of 12.75% and advanced loans to group companies or relatives at 12% interest rate. The...

  2. Distinction between "lack of inquiry and inadequate inquiry" emphasized. Assessee underwent rigorous assessment proceedings with multiple notices and replies. AO...

  3. The Appellate Tribunal examined the issue of invoking revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 in a case involving receipts of accommodation entries and reopening of assessment....

  4. Section 263 revision - derivative transactions losses - inadequate inquiry by Assessing Officer (AO). Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) set aside AO's order for...

  5. Revision u/s 263 - Revision based on Audit Objection - a mechanical exercise of revisionary powers u/s 263 by the Revisionary Authority by merely citing the Audit...

  6. The assessee dealt with a penny stock, and the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct proper inquiry during reassessment proceedings. The Principal Commissioner of...

  7. Validity of an ex-parte revisionary order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act. The key points are: The PCIT passed...

  8. The High Court held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) lacked jurisdiction to pass an order u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act in this case. The Assessing...

  9. The assessee claimed exemption from long-term capital gains tax on the sale of agricultural land situated beyond the prescribed distance from municipal limits. The...

  10. The case pertains to the revision of an assessment order u/s 263 regarding the applicability of the higher tax rate u/s 115BBE on unexplained expenditure u/s 69C. The...

  11. The assessment order was passed without verifying the allowability of the cost of improvement as per Section 55(1)(b)(2), rendering it erroneous and prejudicial to...

  12. AO failed to conduct proper inquiries regarding genuineness of loan transactions for property acquisition. Bank statements revealed assessee lacked funds, payments made...

  13. The Commissioner's invocation of Section 263 for revision of the assessment order was unjustified as the twin conditions of the order being erroneous and prejudicial to...

  14. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - as per CIT AO had failed to verify applicability of the provisions of Section 56(2)(viia) - As far as the invocation of Explanation 2 to...

  15. Assessee surrendered income during survey u/s 133A as unaccounted professional receipts, which AO accepted as professional income taxable at normal rates. PCIT invoked...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates