Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2019 Year 2019 This

Refund claim - time limitation - Section 11B - The doctrine of ...


Refund Denial Overturned: Section 11B Time Limits Contradict Article 265; Doctrine of Merger Influences Outcome.

November 2, 2019

Case Laws     Service Tax     HC

Refund claim - time limitation - Section 11B - The doctrine of merger applicable to the case on hand - the view of the respondent-revenue in denying the refund claimed by the appellant is unjustifiable and hit by Article 265 of the Constitution of India.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

  2. Denial of refund claim - There is no time limit prescribed in the law for issue of show-cause notice to reject a refund claim nor to sanction a refund claim. In the...

  3. Denial of refund claim - Bar of limitation - Whether the time limit of one year has provided under Section 11B is applicable for refund under Rule 5 - Held Yes - time...

  4. Refund Claim u/s 104 of the Finance Act, 2017 - retrospective exemption - The time-limit prescribed u/s 104 (3) is only directory, but however, the time as well as the...

  5. Refund of Service tax - retrospective exemption - The time-limit prescribed u/s 104 (3) is only directory, but however, the time as well as the procedure prescribed u/s...

  6. CESTAT held that fabrication of transmission towers did not constitute manufacture, making excise duty collection illegal under Article 265. The tribunal rejected the...

  7. The case pertains to the jurisdiction of impugned orders under the U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017, and the time limitation u/s 73 and Section 44 of the Act. The key points are:...

  8. Time limit applicable to file refund claim in terms of N/N. 41/2007-ST dated 06/10/2007 - There is no provision to extend the said time limit - AT

  9. Filing of Form GST TRAN-1 - time limit for filing of the form - The time limit stipulated under Rule 117 of the Rules is not ultra vires of the Act. This Rule is...

  10. Refund of CENVAT Credit - alleged lack of nexus - The procedure for claiming such refund, enshrined in notification no. 27/2012-Central Excise Act, 1944 (NT) dated 18th...

  11. Doctrine of merger applied to impugned order of Appellate Tribunal imposing penalty on appellant. Held that since Supreme Court's judgment on appeal against Tribunal's...

  12. Refund of SAD - rejection on the ground of time limitation - The issue of time limit for filing refund claim was subject matter of litigation before the Hon’ble High...

  13. HC determined that GST refund claims on notice pay recovery were not time-barred under CGST Act Section 54. Following Circular No. 178/10/2022-GST, notice pay recovery...

  14. Refund claim - Period of limitation - Doctrine of merger - importer having registered a ‘Protest’ - The Tribunal held that, "the doctrine of merger" implies that the...

  15. Refund of cenvat credit - Period of limitation - Rule does not specify any time limit for claiming the refund of credit - rejection of refund is not sustainable - AT

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates