CESTAT held that fabrication of transmission towers did not ...

Tribunal Rules Transmission Tower Fabrication Not Manufacturing, Orders Refund with Interest Under Central Excise Act.

January 28, 2025

Case Laws Central Excise AT

CESTAT held that fabrication of transmission towers did not constitute manufacture, making excise duty collection illegal under Article 265. The tribunal rejected the department's time limitation argument u/s 11B of Central Excise Act, ruling that time limits do not apply when tax was not payable. The endorsement "under protest" on gate passes was deemed sufficient despite non-compliance with Rule 233B formalities. The appellant was granted refund with 12% interest per annum from the date of initial refund rejection, as retention of revenue deposit was held unconstitutional. The tribunal emphasized that procedural technicalities cannot override substantive rights when tax is collected without legal authority.

View Source

← Previous Next →

CESTAT held that fabrication of transmission towers did not ...

Tribunal Rules Transmission Tower Fabrication Not Manufacturing, Orders Refund with Interest Under Central Excise Act.

January 28, 2025

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

CESTAT ruled in favor of appellant regarding CENVAT credit eligibility for electrical transmission tower materials and related services. The tribunal held that...

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

CESTAT dismissed appeal concerning refund claim of unutilized Cenvat Credit under s.142(3) of CGST Act, read with Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules and s.11B of Central...

Denial of CENVAT Credit availed on goods which were used in the erection of transmission towers installed from the power plant to the factory for bringing in the...

CESTAT allowed the appeal regarding refund of unutilized accumulated CENVAT credit. Department's rejection of refund claim citing ineligible input services under Rule...

Denial of interest on the refund claim sanctioned to the appellant - it is seen that in ordinary course of refund arising out of finalization of provisional assessment...

The appellant sought refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid in cash u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 142(3)...

ITAT held that interest on refund is payable till the date funds are released to assessee, not till date of order accepting refund claim. Relying on Delhi HC's Nokia...

Refund of CENVAT Credit - alleged lack of nexus - The procedure for claiming such refund, enshrined in notification no. 27/2012-Central Excise Act, 1944 (NT) dated 18th...

Refund of IGST paid on export of goods under Rule 96 of CGST Rules 2017

Refund of CENVAT Credit under rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - Notification

Refund of Cenvat credit - Rule 5 – Power of Additional Commissioner to adjudicate refund claim - AT

Correctness of erasure of credit already availed by prospective invalidation of eligibility for retention of credit that would subject those services already procured...

Valuation - transmission towers - inclusion of value of nuts and bolts in assessable value - The transaction of the nuts and bolts is clearly a trading activity on which...

Scope of the order pursuant to remand back of the matter - Refund of Excess Duty paid - The Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) has travelled beyond the remand order passed by...

Quick Updates: