Penalty u/s. 271AAB - 10% OR 30% of undisclosed income - the ...

Taxpayer Penalty Unjust Under Income Tax Act Section 271AAB Due to Revenue Authorities' Failures.

November 14, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s. 271AAB - 10% OR 30% of undisclosed income - the department having taken the huge amount in their custody, cannot take unjust enrichment of it, when on one hand the department says it is assessees undisclosed income and then, not doing what he [assessee] directs to do with his money and thereafter finding fault with him and penalizing him for their [revenue] own omission cannot be accepted.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s. 271AAB - 10% OR 30% of undisclosed income - the ...

Taxpayer Penalty Unjust Under Income Tax Act Section 271AAB Due to Revenue Authorities' Failures.

November 14, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

The provisions of the IBC 2016 would prevail over the Income Tax Act 1961. Income Tax authorities have limited jurisdiction to assess/determine the quantum of Income Tax...

The assessee failed to file the original return of income, and the Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings for underreporting income. The assessee's authorized...

The ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal, holding that penalty under s.271G for failure to furnish transfer pricing documentation cannot be levied against the German resident...

ITAT affirmed CIT(A)'s directive to grant TDS credit per Form 26AS despite taxpayer's initial failure to claim full credit in tax return due to software technical issues....

Levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) - The bonafide or other wise malafide of non compliance is also required to be kept in mind. The tax and interest are statutory levies,...

This case deals with the validity of a declaration under the Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme (VCES) for service tax dues. The taxpayer was issued a show cause...

Control of income-tax authorities - U/s 118 of IT ACT 1961 - Specifies the income-tax authority or authorities as subordinate to such other income-tax authority or...

Tax authority rejected rectification application filed by taxpayer for zero-rated supply citing violation of principles of natural justice. Court examined impugned...

Penalty order u/s 271AAB for treating an amount included in the Return of Income as 'undisclosed income' was found unjustified. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)...

Difference between assessed income and returned income arose due to inadvertent error in taking opening written down value (WDV) at book value instead of WDV under...

CBIC clarifies procedure for departmental appeals regarding interest/penalty under Section 128A of CGST Act. Where taxpayers have fully paid tax demands under Section 73...

ITAT cancelled penalty under s271B for failure to furnish tax audit report under s44AB. Assessee, a first-time taxpayer from remote area, had engaged CA who audited...

The taxpayer, an IT/support services provider, received reimbursements from its associated enterprises (AEs) for the cost of providing such services. The tax authorities...

New Personal Income Tax Regime heralds significant relief, especially for Middle Class Taxpayers

Quick Updates: