Tribunals are not Constitutional Courts - if repeated ...

Case Laws Customs

December 13, 2019

Tribunals are not Constitutional Courts - if repeated adjournments were sought, the learned Tribunal could impose some costs on the appellant, but the appeals could not have been dismissed for want of prosecution or without deciding the merits of the case even though ex-parte, if it becomes necessary.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Tribunals are not Constitutional Courts - if repeated ...

Case Laws Customs

December 13, 2019

You may also like:

Tribunal had passed the exparte order directing pre-deposit - repeated adjournment sought by the counsel - matter restored before tribunal for reconsideration - HC

Execution of the award passed by the learned Arbitral Tribunal/Court - If the High Courts convert itself to the Executing Court and entertain the writ petitions under...

Tribunal dismissed the appeal despite the adjournment sought by the appellant - The order passed by the Tribunal being contrary to the principles of natural justice - HC

Adjournment request - tribunal refused to adjourn the hearing and dismissed the appeal - when such requests were received by the Tribunal, seeking an adjournment of the...

Maintainability of appeal - non-prosecution of the case - Request for adjournment, which cannot be accepted in virtual hearing - The case involved repeated requests for...

Doctrine of merger applied to impugned order of Appellate Tribunal imposing penalty on appellant. Held that since Supreme Court's judgment on appeal against Tribunal's...

The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case regarding rectification u/s 254 related to Compensation under BTALA. The Tribunal found the applicant's attempt for...

The CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, dismissed an appeal due to abatement caused by non-prosecution of the case. The Tribunal held that adjourning a matter beyond three...

Judicial Discipline - Seeking refund of accumulated Cenvat credit - input services or not - The department had not accepted the judgement in the case of Paul Merchants...

Deduction u/s 80P - interest income - The tribunal noted that section 80P(2)(a)(i) allows deduction for cooperative societies engaged in banking or providing credit...

TP Adjustment - Selection of MAM - Perusal of para 5 of the order giving alleged reasons by the learned Tribunal leaves more confusion than clarity. We are also...

TP Adjustment - determination of appropriate method - Matter remanded back to ITAT - We do not expect a further open remand by the learned Tribunal on the said issue any...

Rectification u/s 254 - The High Court acknowledges that the Tribunal is the final authority to ascertain facts. However, it must rectify any apparent mistakes in its...

Rectification application u/s 254 - Tribunal not followed the decision on the identical facts by the Coordinate Bench which is confirmed by this Court - The Court...

Contempt proceedings - The Tribunal (NCLT) and the Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) have the same ‘jurisdiction’, ‘powers’ and ‘Authority’ in respect of contempt of it as the...

Quick Updates: