Power of Tribunal u/s 254 to dismiss the appeal in limine - non ...

Tribunal Misapplied Section 254: Appeal Dismissed for Non-Prosecution Without Merit Review; Orders Set Aside and Restored.

August 29, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Power of Tribunal u/s 254 to dismiss the appeal in limine - non prosecution - the Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeal only on the ground of non prosecution without adverting to the merits of the matter - order are set aside and the appeals are restored to the file of the Tribunal for a decision on merits

View Source

← Previous Next →

Power of Tribunal u/s 254 to dismiss the appeal in limine - non ...

Tribunal Misapplied Section 254: Appeal Dismissed for Non-Prosecution Without Merit Review; Orders Set Aside and Restored.

August 29, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

Dismissal of the appeal by CIT(Appeals) for non-prosecution - The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision due to the assessee's failure to respond to multiple hearing notices...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the validity of a revision u/s 263, focusing on the alleged non-consideration of the assessee's submissions by the Principal...

Condonation of delay in filing of Review Application - In view of the fact that Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to the Court / Tribunal whether the...

Review of the order - The Tribunal does not have the power to even review an order, much less to hear the appeal afresh on merit.

Review petition - Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Tribunal sustaining the levy without providing an opportunity of hearing - Review applicant had paid entire tax amount...

Review of Order after gap of 13 years - delay can be condoned or not - There is a period of one year provided as per the Act, 2003 for seeking review of any order passed...

The Commercial Tax Tribunal cannot proceed to consider and decide an appeal ex parte in the absence of the revisionist/appellant, as it would violate principles of...

The appeals under PMLA were allowed. The freezing/attachment order would continue during the investigation period of 365 days or pendency of the case before the Court...

CIT(Appeals) dismissed assessee's appeal for non-prosecution despite assessee being afforded multiple opportunities to participate. However, CIT(Appeals) failed to...

The review petition filed u/s 114 read with Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was dismissed as the petitioner failed to establish any mistake or...

Refund claim - Principles of unjust enrichment - Imported goods as ''wireless telephone'' - The Tribunal's findings indicated that the appellant had paid duty without...

Tribunal held that an order passed following binding precedents cannot be recalled or reviewed based on a subsequent contrary judgment of a higher court. Once an order...

CIT(A) allowed assessee to withdraw appeal against section 263 revision order, stating Tribunal quashed section 263 order and CIT(A) erred in not deciding appeal merits....

Power of Tribunal to dismiss the Appeals for want of prosecution - Even if the assessee could not appear, the Tribunal should decided the appeal on merits, ex parte,...

Quick Updates: