Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - there was no specific charges as ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 13, 2019

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - there was no specific charges as relates to concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income - There is separate provision for penalty in search cases given u/s 271AAB which was totally ignored by the Assessing Officer - Penalty deleted.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - there was no specific charges as ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 13, 2019

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

The assessee challenged the penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) for short credit of sale consideration received from the sale of copyrights and cable rights. The issue...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

The crux pertains to levying penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for alleged furnishing of inaccurate particulars or concealment of income regarding capital gains computation on sale...

Validity of the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) or 158BFA - AO has levied the penalty under section 271(1)(C) of the Act by observing that the assessee has concealed/furnished...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Penalty U/s 271(1)(c) - addition was confirmed by CIT(A) and ITAT, Thus, there is no dispute with regard to the concealment of income and furnishing of inaccurate...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income was declared in survey u/s 133A - date of filing of return u/s 139(1) had not expired - The fact of “concealment of income” and...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - the mere disallowance under section 43B would not amount to concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - no penalty.

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - AO has not applied his mind before initiating the penalty proceedings rather borrowed his satisfaction from the “tax...

Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Addition of LTCG - Assessing Officer while recording satisfaction has invoked both the charges of section 271(1)(c) - ambiguity and...

Penalty levied u/s 271 (1) (c) - As the appellants had disclosed the income, after detection by the department and as per the terms of settlement, the assessing officer...

Levying the penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - Just for making wrong claims made advertently or inadvertently, therefore, penalty cannot be levied u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AO has levied penalty u/s 271(1)(c) only invoking the Explanation 5A below section 271(1)(c) and not held the assessee liable for concealment of...

Quick Updates: