Re-assessment u/s 73(1) - there was no assessment order as such, ...

Re-assessment under Service Tax Act's Section 73(1) requires an initial assessment order; without it, notices are invalid.

January 2, 2020

Case Laws Service Tax HC

Re-assessment u/s 73(1) - there was no assessment order as such, there could not be a notice for re-assessment inasmuch as the question of re-assessment would arise only when there has been assessment for the first instance. The proceedings under section 73(1) of the Act 1994 not being merely the re-assessment proceedings, the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner stands negated.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Re-assessment u/s 73(1) - there was no assessment order as such, ...

Re-assessment under Service Tax Act's Section 73(1) requires an initial assessment order; without it, notices are invalid.

January 2, 2020

Case Laws Service Tax HC

You may also like:

Notice u/s 143(2) issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer/Deputy Commissioner is invalid and cannot be cured. The assessment order framed u/s 143(3) based on...

The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

The case involved a dispute regarding the classification of services provided by the appellant as Works Contract Service or Construction of Residential...

The ITAT held that the limitation period for issuing a notice u/s 143(2) is relevant to the financial year and assessment year. When the Assessing Officer considered the...

Validity of Service of notice u/s 74(5) instead of u/s 74(1) of CGST / UPGST Act, 2017 - Non-payment of Tax / GST - The High Court observed that while a notice was...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Manner of service of notice - there is no mentioning of reasons by the A.O. in the assessment order as to why the Notice has to be served through...

Section 28A of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 dispenses with the requirement of a second notice and opportunity of personal hearing before proceeding with best...

Levying penalty u/s 272A(1) - non-compliance of the notice - Nonappearance of the assessee in response to the initial notice under section 142(1) of the Act was not...

Processing of invalid return u/s 143(1) - Denial of exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) - non-filing of ITR-V within 120 days made the assessee’s return as ‘invalid’ being...

The assessment u/s 143(1) was invalid as the procedure laid down u/s 144B was not followed. The case was selected for regular assessment, but the assessee was not given...

The HC held that the Jurisdictional Assessment Officer (JAO) has exclusive jurisdiction to issue notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act. For assessment, re-assessment or...

For payment of tax, no assessment order is required and only in case of short payment of tax assessment is required after due notice - but for the deferral in payment of...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

Quick Updates: