Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Manner of service of notice - there is ...

Case Laws Income Tax

August 28, 2023

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Manner of service of notice - there is no mentioning of reasons by the A.O. in the assessment order as to why the Notice has to be served through affixture and the A.O. has not mentioned anything regarding efforts of ‘due and reasonable diligence to serve the notice’ on the assessee as required under rule 17 of order V of the CPC, thus the Service of Notice by way of affixture on the Assessee cannot be construed as sufficient Service of Notice. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Manner of service of notice - there is ...

Case Laws Income Tax

August 28, 2023

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non appearance before the Assessing Officer - AO kept an issuing notices on the wrong address even when the first notice was not served...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - notice issued but not served - Simply penalty has been imposed by considering that the notices were issued. In our view, service of notice is...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non compliance to notice 142(1) - It is evident that date of service of the statutory notice in question issued u/s 142(1), has not been...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - failure to comply with the notices issued by the A.O u/s 142(1) - the non-compliance on the part of the assessee is due to the reason of...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

Levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - defective notice - it would be too technical and pedantic to take the view that because in the printed notice the inapplicable portion...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - Emphasizing the principles outlined by the Karnataka High Court, the Tribunal reaffirmed the importance of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non compliance of notices u/s 142(1) - the AO was not having the present address of the assessee - when the notice issued u/s 142(1) was not...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Notice u/s 271AAB to levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AO gets the jurisdiction to levy the penalty by issuing a notice and therefore, it is not a procedural requirement but...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - The notice u/s. 274 r.w.s. 271(l)(c) of the Act were issued without striking off the irrelevant portion of the limb...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - As a matter of fact the notice issued u/s 274 read with section 271 of the Act itself was ambiguous as it did not make it clear as to under which...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Mandation of specification of charge - It is clear that for the AO to assume jurisdiction u/s 271(1)(c), proper notice is necessary and the...

Quick Updates: