The ITAT held that the assessment order under section 143(3) was ...

Assessment Order Invalid When Different ITO Issues Notices Without Proper Transfer Under Section 127

March 25, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT held that the assessment order under section 143(3) was invalid due to jurisdictional defects. The initial notice under section 143(2) was issued by ITO, Ward-4(5), Raipur, while the subsequent notice under section 142(1) and final assessment were made by ITO, Ward-3(1), Raipur without any transfer order under section 127 from the Pr. CIT. The Tribunal emphasized that notice, derived from Latin "notitia," requires proper time, place, nature of hearing, legal authority, and specific charges. Since the assessment proceedings suffered from lack of jurisdiction with no valid transfer order and improper notice issuance, the entire proceedings were declared non-est in law. The assessee's appeal was allowed and the assessment order quashed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT held that the assessment order under section 143(3) was ...

Assessment Order Invalid When Different ITO Issues Notices Without Proper Transfer Under Section 127

March 25, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The High Court examined whether proper show cause notices were issued before passing impugned orders u/s 73(9) of the State GST Act. It held that the summary of show...

Assessment framed without issuing mandatory notice u/s 143(2) by jurisdictional officer. Assessee filed return with Range-1(1), notice u/s 143(2) issued by ITO,...

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

Jurisdiction powers to issue Reopening notice in metro city - It was established that the notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued by an Income Tax Officer (ITO),...

The High Court held that the assessment order u/ss 144 and 144B cannot be completed without issuing a notice u/s 143(2). Reliance on the petitioner's PAN database or an...

The court held that the notices issued u/s 133(6) and the subsequent notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act were invalid. The petitioner had filed a reply to the notice...

The High Court quashed a letter dated March 13, 2024, issued by the Superintendent (A.E.) Central Goods and Service Tax, Gautam Budh Nagar, advising voluntary tax...

Validity of re-assessment proceedings - jurisdiction to issue notice - Validity of notice u/s 143(2) as issued by the ITO, Ward 33(2)(3) who was not empowered - ITO who...

Issue of notice versus service of notice - Income escaping assessment - validity of notice u/s 147 - there has been proper issue of notice within the limitation period...

Reassessment u/s 147 - validity of notice - reasons for reopening the assessment have been recorded by the jurisdictional AO viz. the Dy. CIT, Circle 2, Jamnagar but the...

The High Court held that the Summary of the Show Cause Notice along with the attachment containing the determination of tax cannot be considered a valid initiation of...

Cancellation of petitioner's registration - vague SCN - The particulars such as designation and office of the issuing authority are also not mentioned in the show-cause...

Validity of assessment order - Transfer of case from jurisdiction - Notice u/s 143(2) was issued by the ITO Ward-2, Malegaon, Nasik, Maharashtra whereas Assessment order...

Notice issued u/s 148 - Transfer of a case - The order passed by CIT transferring jurisdiction from ITO, New Delhi on 04-01-2010, subsequent action of the AO i.e. ITO...

Validity of reopening of assessment - no valid notice issued - A notice or an order without having signature of the person who issued such notice loses its relevance and...

Quick Updates: