Validity of Assessment u/s 144C(1) - whether the draft ...

Unsigned Draft Order u/s 144C(1) Does Not Invalidate Final Assessment; Stamped and Signed Order Upheld.

January 3, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Validity of Assessment u/s 144C(1) - whether the draft assessment order forwarded to the assessee left unsigned - non–signing of the draft assessment order forwarded to the assessee would not be that fatal to invalidate the final assessment order - However, it is found that the same was stamped and signed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of Assessment u/s 144C(1) - whether the draft ...

Unsigned Draft Order u/s 144C(1) Does Not Invalidate Final Assessment; Stamped and Signed Order Upheld.

January 3, 2020

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Validity of unsigned order - Final assessment order not signed by the AO - DR submitted that the additions made in the draft assessment order and the final assessment...

Validity of assessment u/s 144C - Non passing draft Assessment Order - TP Adjustment - AO merely captioned the final Assessment Order as Draft Assessment Order along...

Validity of assessment order passed u/s 153(1) - Period of limitation - In this case, since, the Assessing Officer cannot invoke jurisdiction u/s.144C(1) and pass draft...

Effect of non-passing draft assessment order u/s 144C(1) - even if assessee had accepted addition to be made on account of TP adjustment, during assessment proceedings,...

Notices issued u/ss 84 and 27(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 were valid. The time limitation for revising assessment orders is not an issue if a...

Assessment u/s 144C - it is for the revenue to devise its own means and ways to correct the software and pass the final assessment order in accordance with the law. In...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond the limitation period, involving the addition of cash deposits in the assessee's savings bank...

Levy of stamp duty on schemes of amalgamation or restructuring - The High court found that orders of the court sanctioning amalgamation/restructuring, along with the...

The jurisdictional Assessing Officer (AO) had suo moto transferred the assessment to Income Tax Officer (ITO), Ward 2(2) Noida. The appellant contended that the...

Assessment made u/s 144 r.w.s. 142(1) OR 153C - The Tribunal held that the assessment made u/s 144 r.w.s. 142(1) for A.Y. 2012-13, based on the satisfaction recorded on...

Re-assessment u/s 73(1) - there was no assessment order as such, there could not be a notice for re-assessment inasmuch as the question of re-assessment would arise only...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving the levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) due to the Accountant's Covid-19...

Reopening of assessment - Disallowance of deduction claimed u/s 35(1)(ii) - The tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment, ruling it as a procedural irregularity...

The assessment u/s 143(1) was invalid as the procedure laid down u/s 144B was not followed. The case was selected for regular assessment, but the assessee was not given...

Transfer pricing - Validity of the final assessment order passed u/s 144C(13) - Period of limitation - In the instant case, the manual final assessment order is dated 24....

Quick Updates: