Valuation - Extended period of limitation - Merely because the ...

Appellant's Revenue Neutrality Claim Rejected; Full Duty Payment and Penalty Upheld Under Extended Limitation Period.

January 11, 2020

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Valuation - Extended period of limitation - Merely because the sister unit will get CENVAT Credit, the appellant cannot NOT PAY full duty in open defiance of the law and take shelter under “Revenue Neutrality” to escape liability. - Demand with penalty upheld.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Valuation - Extended period of limitation - Merely because the ...

Appellant's Revenue Neutrality Claim Rejected; Full Duty Payment and Penalty Upheld Under Extended Limitation Period.

January 11, 2020

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

CESTAT held that the respondent's rebate claim based on CIF value was permissible under Central Excise law. The tribunal determined the respondent is eligible for full...

Refund claim rejected by adjudicating authority on grounds that services provided by appellant to SOLCIL did not qualify for exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-ST...

HC dismissed appellant's plea regarding duty exemption on goods transferred for job work. The court rejected the revenue neutrality argument based on CENVAT credit...

Benefit of reduced penalty of 15% u/s 28(5) - Delay in payment of penalty due to Public Holiday - The appellant voluntarily paid the differential BCD and interest upon...

Rejection of refund claim - The Tribunal observed that a pre-notice consultation was issued to the appellant, who responded by paying the demanded duty and interest. As...

Extended Period of limitation - Revenue Neutrality - The issue involved is also of pure interpretation of provisions of levy of duty including profit in assessable value...

ITAT upheld penalties imposed under s.271(1)(c) against appellant firm for multiple violations. Unexplained cash credits in partners' capital accounts violated...

HC dismissed the appeal, upholding penalties against the appellant for customs duty evasion. The court found the appellant's claims of merely lending his Importer...

Levy of penalty u/s 270A - Excess exemption claimed on Gratuity u/s 10(10)(i) and Leave Encashment receipts u/s 10(10AA)(ii) - The Appellate Tribunal recognized the...

Refund claim was rejected as time-barred, having been filed beyond the one-year limitation period stipulated u/s 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant had...

Recovery of rebate of duty - eligibility to claim rebate on portion pertaining to special packing done overseas - excess payment of duty on additional protective packing...

Non-payment of interest on account of Revenue Neutrality - when duty demand itself is not sustainable on Revenue Neutrality, it will not be correct to demand interest on...

Extended period of limitation - Revenue Neutrality - Clandestine Removal - In case of clandestine clearance against the delivery memo there could be no claim of CENVAT...

Clandestine manufacture and removal allegation - substantial electricity consumption cited as evidence - no other corroborative evidence found - Revenue failed to rebut...

NCLAT upheld rejection of appellant's belated claim for interest payments in liquidation proceedings. Appellant failed to file claims within prescribed timeline and...

Quick Updates: