Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2020 Year 2020 This

Imposition of penalty on sales agent of foreign supplier u/s ...


Sales agent of foreign supplier cleared of penalties under Customs Act sections 112(a) & 112(b) due to lack of evidence.

February 6, 2020

Case Laws     Customs     AT

Imposition of penalty on sales agent of foreign supplier u/s 112(a) and/ or 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 - omission/ commission committed by sales agent of foreign supplier or not who has acted on the direction of Principal - He was acting in course of normal business - There is nothing on record to establish that he had abetted in the evasion of duty by mis-declaring the value - No penalty.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

  2. Penalty levied u/s 112(b) of Customs Act challenged due to lack of proper evidence. Appellant obtained PNR movement documents from steamer agent for cargo movement from...

  3. The case involved penalties u/ss 112(a) and 112(b) of the Customs Act for smuggling foreign gold. The tribunal held that statements without cross-examination are...

  4. CESTAT set aside the confiscation of foreign liquors and various foreign goods as well as penalties imposed under Sections 112(a) and 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962...

  5. Mis-declaration of quantity and value of goods in SEZ unit - penalty u/ss 112(a) and 114A of Customs Act 1962. Option for reduced 25% penalty u/s 114A to be extended if...

  6. Imposition of penalties u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962 on Customs broker - import of used Multifunction Digital Photocopiers and Printers - it is alleged that the...

  7. Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

  8. The case involved jurisdiction for show cause notice and Order-in-Original, penalty u/s 112(a) and 112(b) of the Customs Act, and confiscation of gold jewelry. The...

  9. Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

  10. Levy of penalty - Generalia specialibus non derogant - levy of special penalty over general penalty - the Commissioner perfectly justified in imposing penalty under...

  11. Appellant financed an individual for smuggling gold from Dubai and selling it in India. Penalty was imposed u/s 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner held...

  12. Levy of penalty u/s 112 (a) of the Customs Act 1962 - Customs House Agent (CHA) - violation of Regulation 13 of CHALR 2004 - It is alleged that the appellant did not...

  13. Penalty u/s 112 - since penalty has been imposed on partnership firm under Section 112 (a), separate penalty on its partner would not be justified - AT

  14. Recovery of sales tax dues - encumbered property or not - liability of auction purchasers - this is a clear case in which the Sales Tax Department had a charge on the...

  15. Penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 - The admitted act of the importer amounts to a clear omission, for which penalty under Section 112(a) ibid. appears to be...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates