Interpretation of Statute - imposition of interest - The ...

Court Rules Interest Cannot Be Retrospectively Imposed Before July 13, 2006 Under Amended Substantive Law.

February 18, 2020

Case Laws Customs HC

Interpretation of Statute - imposition of interest - The retrospective levy is not intended and the amendment in Law is a substantive provision for making a provision for levy of interest in the present case - Therefore, for a period prior to 13.07.2006, such levy of interest cannot be imposed on the Assessee. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Interpretation of Statute - imposition of interest - The ...

Court Rules Interest Cannot Be Retrospectively Imposed Before July 13, 2006 Under Amended Substantive Law.

February 18, 2020

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

Impugned show cause notice for shortfall in service tax payment based on Rule 5(1) of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 quashed as ultra vires Section 67...

CESTAT allowed appeal concerning service tax on payments made by appellant to overseas logistics agents. Tribunal held that pre-April 2006 demand of Rs. 11,97,047 was...

Claim of interest with refund of Pre-deposit made - Rate of interest - amount was deposited under protest - Revenue are expected to at least now, on or before 15th July,...

Benefit of refund under Notification No. 05/2006, read with Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - Notification No. 05/2006 was retrospectively amended and word "in” has...

Whether the press release of 01.10.2009 announcing modifications to the Mega Power Policy 2006 constitutes a 'Change in Law' under Article 13 of the Power Purchase...

The High Court allowed the petition and quashed the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's refund application for unutilized input tax credit. The court held that the...

The notification GSR 383(E) dated 19.04.2018 amended the relevant clause, which came into effect on the date of publication. Consequently, the Directorate had 90 days...

Safe Harbour Rule - Income-tax (18th Amendment) Rules, 2022 - Amends Rule 10TD - Notification

Compliance with rule 3A by certain Nidhis - Rule 23A of the Nidhi Rules, 2014 - As amended

Maintainability of Revision Petition before the High Court when the petitioner has alternate remedies as per the - an ex-parte decree was passed against the respondent -...

HC determined that Notification No. 54/2018-Central Tax amending Rule 96(10) of CGST Rules operates prospectively from October 9, 2018, not retrospectively from October...

Right of the auction purchaser of the property - Right of the Defaulter of Loan / Borrowers to redeem the secured property - in accordance with the unamended Section...

SC affirmed the Trial Court's conviction of the accused for bribery offenses under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988....

The appellants challenged the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) denying eligible interest on the refunded amount. The court held that interest accrued on the deposited...

ED to share information with GSTN for launching prosecution - Notification No. G.S.R. 381(E), dated the 27th June, 2006 amended vide 7th July, 2023

Quick Updates: